• theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        No, I meant precisely what I wrote. The point being that if it were $4, “underpowered” would be an absurd way to describe it, because value is a function of cost versus benefit, where benefit is subjective.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Not really. This is made to play current games, and it’s underpowered for that no matter what the price is. It could still be great value while being underpowered.

          Think about it like this - if you expect to play cyberpunk, would a $1 raspberry pi that can play it at 1fps be underpowered? It’s still great value at $1, but surely you can agree that for the job at hand it is underpowered?

          • theherk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yes I agree, if we can move the goalposts where ever we want, you might have a point for your own narrow view. But there will be people that believe what it delivers to be suitable for playing the games they want to play, in which case it won’t be underpowered. Which means its status as underpowered… is debatable.