• pebbles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    organized around producing one or the other of two gamete sizes

    This implies that the organization can fail then? That is how we put the outliers in the binary? That means that that kind of organization has a goal?

    That feels like common sense. Like in the culturally-rooted sense. Not necessarily a reflection of reality, but an easy idea to swallow. I don’t think human development has intention in that kind of way unless you are religious.

    I guess, what makes gamete production the goal of human development? What makes you confident that there is a goal to human development?

    To me it seems like it would be hard to answer those questions without anthropomorphizing human development.

    • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      You’re asking questions that are great, but are philosophical and go beyond this topic. Narrowly, the human body could be said to have a goal of reproducing in the same way a falling rock has a goal of reaching the ground. It’s clear how the physics play out, but there’s nothing that turns that “is” into an “ought”