• vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Pandas are descendants of omnivores with a predator streak, them rat fucking their diet to near koala levels of bad doesn’t really factor in yet.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Idk if “descendants of omnivores” counts because then you could exclude a number of critters like pigs for being “descendants of herbivores” and then 'why do pigs have more stereoscopic vision than a t-rex ’

        The obvious caveat is that pandas at the minimum don’t have selective pressure for side eyes or they have something pressuring stereoscopic vision even more similar to how aquatic animals have less selective pressure for forward facing eyes.

        I would imagine the way pandas eat bamboo stalks is more visual than most herbivores and that alone could help them retain steroscopic vision.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I was trying to imply that pandas did it recently enough for such pressures to not have kicked in yet. Probably should’ve specified that a bit better.

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Google tells me that pandas started eating bamboo 6-8 million years ago and stopped eating meat 3 million years ago.

            That’s not exactly recent.

            For reference, the first Homo appeared 2.8 million years ago and the first Homo Sapiens 300 000 years ago.

            The last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees lived 5-10 million years ago.

            So if evolution can evolve humans in that time frame, you’d expect that it could also adapt an omnivour to a herbivour.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Huh I legit thought they were a more recent species, like last glacial maximum. Is this one of those things like with the three toe sloth and two toe sloth where they are on opposite sides of their evolutionary tree but look generally similar? Are pandas kinda like sun bears where they are more or less doing their own thing while black, brown, and polar bears stay grouped weirdly close to each other in behavior.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            That’s the speculation on gut length in pandas based on statistical methods but panda teeth are already well adapted to eat bamboo so selection has been working on them for some time or at least there is no opposing selection at work in panda teeth preventing them from changing. Strangly the large canines are used to cut the bamboo which might be what created their niche in the first place, but their teeth are otherwise very different from other bear teeth.

            Its been a while since I dove into this but from what I remember the speculation with gut length has to do with metabolic tradeoff. If pandas don’t get that tradeoff with the food they eat then they’ll probably keep their current gut length. Or they might make a different tradeoff (slower peristalsis, more gut surface area)

    • notsure@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      …i am withholding all judgments on pandas until my full research has been completed…i heard something on the internet…

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, but Pandas aren’t herbivores, they’re vegetarians. They’re too slow and clumsy to actually hunt prey, so the only thing they can catch is bamboo (which is the fastest growing plant, so I guess that’s something…sort of…). Anyway, the point is, Pandas as a species are from a family of predators, and they would absolutely eat meat if you gave it to them.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Pandas stopped eating meat about 3 million years ago. That’s before the first being of the genus Homo appeared. Not Homo Sapiens (that was 300 000 years ago), but Homo Habilis (2.5mio years ago).

        If evolution can take us from something that’s barely an ape to humans in that time frame, you’d expect that it can fix an omnivour’s digestive system to work with plants.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      But Pandas are bears and haven’t changed much. They eat plants and their guts have not even evolved to do so yet. They are a wonder.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They stopped eating meat 3 million years ago. That’s longer ago than the appearance of the first animal of the genus Homo.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Sure but their digestive system is still that of a carnivore. And they are still classified as carnivora. And where do you get 3 million years I could find a couple thousand years.

    • sbird@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Is this because pandas used to be carnivorous? (they have sharp canine teeth despite pretty much only eating bamboo)