• leftascenter@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    A desktop running a low usage wouldn’t consume much more than a NAS, as long as you drop the video card (which wouldn’t be running anyways).

    Take only that extra and you probably have a few years usage before additional electricty costs overrun NAS cost. Where I live that’s around 5 years for an estimated extra 10W.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      as long as you drop the video card

      As I wrote below, some motherboards won’t POST without a GPU.

      Take only that extra and you probably have a few years usage before additional electricty costs overrun NAS cost. Where I live that’s around 5 years for an estimated extra 10W.

      Yeah, and what’s more, if one of those appliance-like NASes breaks down, how do you fix it? With a normal PC you just swap out the defective part.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Most modern boards will. Also there’s integrated graphics on basically every single current CPU. Only AMD on AM4 held out on having iGPUs for so damn long.