• deranger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    The absolute distance is extremely relevant to how many particles reach the planet, which in turn is extremely relevant to how bright the aurora is.

    • Gust@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      That is correct. It also has nothing to do with the original claim I made and you disagreed with, which is that the object with the greater magnetic field would be able to attract particles from farther away.

      • deranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Well, that statement is completely incorrect. The magnetic field doesn’t attract particles, which I stated in my earlier comment. It only guides the particles towards the poles, particles which were already headed towards the planet after being emitted. It does not attract particles (pull, in your words) towards the planet that would otherwise miss it had the magnetic field not existed.

        In fact, a stronger magnetic field would be a better shield to deflect particles away from a majority of the planet.

        • Gust@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          That is a fundamental misunderstanding of how magnetic fields and the forces they induce work. Attract and guide are both words that mean the same thing in this context, ie “apply force to.” Not sure what else to tell you; I dont feel like teaching you electrodynamics so I wont reply to this thread again.