I feel like any paper that’s published that cited a paper which got retracted, should automatically be reviewed and assessed to determine if they should also be retracted.
I agree, except it should be retracted automatically, & only re-admitted if the review is successful in ascertaining legitimacy, & all papers that cite retracted papers receive the same treatment while allowing them to be automatically re-instated if their sources become legitimate after review; let the psudoscience fall like the house of cards that it is.
I feel like any paper that’s published that cited a paper which got retracted, should automatically be reviewed and assessed to determine if they should also be retracted.
I agree, except it should be retracted automatically, & only re-admitted if the review is successful in ascertaining legitimacy, & all papers that cite retracted papers receive the same treatment while allowing them to be automatically re-instated if their sources become legitimate after review; let the psudoscience fall like the house of cards that it is.