• uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The biggest threat is that the CEO is pro maga (cue defenders saying “well ackshully”) and thinks trump is better for his business (cue tankie both sidesers).

        The other threat is that at some point proton gave an IP address or something obtained through a legal france->swiss court order allowing french ACABs to hunt and skin the most dangerous game: journalists

        Edit, activist I guess https://www.itpro.com/security/privacy/360793/protonmail-criticised-sharing-activists-ip-address-law-enforcement

        • ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Okay, so about #1: Is there more to it than him setting of one single post praising Trump’s business skills? I mean, that’s pretty stupid, but stamping him as “Pro-MAGA” for that seems a bit far fetched still.

          About #2: That’s also concerning and pretty bad as it reads, but any company basically has to abide the country’s laws, so if Interpol orders the Swiss police to fetch the data, no legally operating company can really do anything about it or they’re gone as well. A similar thing happened to Tutanota in Germany, iirc.

          • SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            about #1: you see, your point is already defeated, because he called you a “defender saying actually”

            ofc, you are right, and everyone saying that Proton ceo is pro maga from that one statement has reading comprehension problems

            • EvenOdds@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Personally, my biggest problem with the proton CEOs actions, is that he doubled down using official proton social media. This went well beyond a “personal opinion” and made this sound like a position the company held.

        • percent@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          🤔 why is the privacy thing not the biggest threat? I would think that the privacy one would be more of a threat to privacy than the political stuff. Is that not the case?

          • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            I don’t know how you can, with a straight face, separate “political” and “privacy” stuff. They are intrinsically linked.

            The amount of hoops needed to make the IP address thing, which is just IP address, happen…massive

            • percent@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Sure, I can imagine the political issues could lead to privacy issues. My question was not about whether or not that’s true[1]. I was simply wondering why a possible privacy issue would rank higher than the actual issue that has already happened.


              1. Something more specific/objective might be helpful though. Saying he’s “pro maga” is like saying he’s “bad vibes”; it requires the reader to just take your word for it without knowing exactly why. But, again, my question was more about the ranking ↩︎

              • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I just don’t think the IP address is a big deal. A category 5 probably outranks a definite tropical depression.