Saying you tried something simpler and it was hard is not proof that this implementation is a fraud. If anything, it just makes you look less credible yourself. If you have specific aspects you can point to that are impractical, and the technical reasons they wouldn’t work, feel free, but it’s not a dodge to say that the diagram makes sense and this team had done a lot of impressive work already.
Are you really asking me to take a video of me using the app for an extended period of time and analyzing the results to determine if it lines up with the various details of the algorithm outlined above? Cause I’m not really sure how else I would prove that its actually implemented as described.
I have not flipped the question, I am just genuinely curious of the details you find hard to believe here. It all seems quite straight forward and understandable to me. Complex, sure, but again, they have done a lot of impressive work already, so it’s not outside the realm of possibility that it is implemented as described. Or at the very least, that’s what they’re working towards. I would love to hear you, a self proclaimed expert on the subject, explain the details that don’t work, other than “I tried and its hard”.
How do you know it’s implemented as described in the picture?
How do you know it’s not?
I already explained how I know. So you can answer my question or just dodge?
Saying you tried something simpler and it was hard is not proof that this implementation is a fraud. If anything, it just makes you look less credible yourself. If you have specific aspects you can point to that are impractical, and the technical reasons they wouldn’t work, feel free, but it’s not a dodge to say that the diagram makes sense and this team had done a lot of impressive work already.
It actually is on account that it’s real world experience that gives me insight into how algorithms are done. Expertise you don’t have
I’m not worried about credibility since I look more credible than you because you flipped a question and never answered how you know
So buddy you gonna prove the algorithm in loop works exactly like it does in the picture or give me the W?
Are you really asking me to take a video of me using the app for an extended period of time and analyzing the results to determine if it lines up with the various details of the algorithm outlined above? Cause I’m not really sure how else I would prove that its actually implemented as described.
I have not flipped the question, I am just genuinely curious of the details you find hard to believe here. It all seems quite straight forward and understandable to me. Complex, sure, but again, they have done a lot of impressive work already, so it’s not outside the realm of possibility that it is implemented as described. Or at the very least, that’s what they’re working towards. I would love to hear you, a self proclaimed expert on the subject, explain the details that don’t work, other than “I tried and its hard”.
Nope asking you to prove that the algorithm works like it does in the picture.
I don’t helping you understand super basic things
How can I prove it, when I don’t have access to the code? Please, tell me how I would prove it, specifically.
I’ll explain it if you admit my points are right and your too ignorant on this subject to argue with me