Post:

If you’re still shipping load‑bearing code in C, C++, Python, or vanilla JavaScript in 2025, you’re gambling with house money and calling it “experience.”

As systems scale, untyped or foot‑gun‑heavy languages don’t just get harder to work with—they hit a complexity cliff. Every new feature is another chance for a runtime type error or a memory bug to land in prod. Now layer LLM‑generated glue code on top of that. More code, more surface area, less anyone truly understands. In that world, “we’ll catch it in tests” is wishful thinking, not a strategy.

We don’t live in 1998 anymore. We have languages that:

  • Make whole classes of bugs unrepresentable (Rust, TypeScript)
  • Give you memory safety and concurrency sanity by default (Rust, Go)
  • Provide static structure that both humans and LLMs can lean on as guardrails, not red tape

At this point, choosing C/C++ for safety‑critical paths, or dynamic languages for the core of a large system, isn’t just “old school.” It’s negligence with better marketing.

Use Rust, Go, or TypeScript for anything that actually matters. Use Python/JS at the edges, for scripts and prototypes.

For production, load‑bearing paths in 2025 and beyond, anything else is you saying, out loud:

“I’m okay with avoidable runtime failures and undefined behavior in my critical systems.”

Are you?

Comment:

Nonsense. If your code has reached the point of unmaintainable complexity, then blame the author, not the language.

  • ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Typescript literally doesn’t work though, every large system has some JavaScript interface somewhere and the “any” type propagates through the system because there’s no type safety at runtime

    Fuck them both to death

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t understand how this would happen. If the any type truly “propagates through the system”, that means you’re passing around a variable of which you say, “I don’t know what this is. You deal with it.” How can you do any meaningful operations on it when you don’t know the type?

    • falseWhite@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Skill issue. You just didn’t set up your tsconfig properly to begin with, which allowed someone to sneak in unsafe code.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        your

        I wouldn’t make a typescript repo. But every single one I’ve had to work on has had the same problem

    • NewDark@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Don’t use any, and figure out any interfaces or types you don’t have. Have a modocum of discipline to add the compile time safety