• VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You can parody a piece of text. They literally just did it by overlaying wojack on top of the dictionary description.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Lol, I always love it when people have to split hairs so finely on definitions that they risk fission.

      I made this joke elsewhere, but this is basically the No True Memesmen fallacy. The definition of meme includes these pictures, and trying to narrow the definition to exclude them is laughable.

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        When everything is a meme, nothing is. Ther is no adaptation, no cultural twist, no recontextualisation or any other relevant criteria in a screenshot of text and nothing else.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Ok, so just make up your own word that has the definition you want, or deal with your definition not being the same as others’. Because the definition of meme isn’t as specific as you want it to be.

          I see this as no different than the people who argued that image macros aren’t memes.

          • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.deOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Because the definition of meme

            The Oxford Dictionary’s definition of a meme you meant to say.

            For example, Jana Zündel (german article), a german meme researcher, stated that a meme always includes a recontextualisation. The Wiki page lists key characteristics such as intertextuality and cultural evolution.

            There is a screenshot from reddit posted here earlier today, do you think that’s a meme? Can you take it, put it in a new context and have it keep its original context as a reference so that the new post would create a new idea building on the context? Or is it just a random story, maybe funny to some?