codeinabox@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoDevelopers remain willing but reluctant to use AI: The 2025 Developer Survey results are herestackoverflow.blogexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1111arrow-down11cross-posted to: lobsters
arrow-up1110arrow-down1external-linkDevelopers remain willing but reluctant to use AI: The 2025 Developer Survey results are herestackoverflow.blogcodeinabox@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square27fedilinkcross-posted to: lobsters
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 days ago Many companies are tying monitored AI usage to performance evaluations The just sounds like good old fashioned mismanagement. Any examples of successful companies that are doing this?
minus-squaremaster_of_unlocking@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 days agoSalesforce definitely does it. Coinbase also recently fired a bunch of devs for not using it (https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/22/coinbase-ceo-explains-why-he-fired-engineers-who-didnt-try-ai-immediately/)
minus-squareJayjader@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 hours agoSalesforce also recently admitted they were too hasty when they tried to replace humans with ais: https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/salesforce-now-admits-its-ai-agents-were-unreliable-after-cutting-4000-jobs/
The just sounds like good old fashioned mismanagement. Any examples of successful companies that are doing this?
Salesforce definitely does it. Coinbase also recently fired a bunch of devs for not using it (https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/22/coinbase-ceo-explains-why-he-fired-engineers-who-didnt-try-ai-immediately/)
Salesforce also recently admitted they were too hasty when they tried to replace humans with ais: https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/salesforce-now-admits-its-ai-agents-were-unreliable-after-cutting-4000-jobs/