• dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    It also helps that we’re talking about rather dense nuclei too. So it’s not just a neutron absorbing blanket, but a rather high-performing one at that. Which you need to convert fusion outputs to heat and power anyway. And gold is soluble in mercury anyway, so extraction is already a known (albeit incredibly dangerous) process. Win-win.

    yielding several tonnes of gold per plant-year

    Mother of god that’s a lot to magic-up outta nowhere. At first I thought this would disrupt the market, but it looks like yearly global gold production is around 3000 tons a year. So it would take a lot of reactors to impact the gold market, so… yeah. Reactors really could start paying for themselves.

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Reactors really could start paying for themselves.

      Yeah, that should help them with their capital, storage costs and Hg procurement costs.
      Now back to the energy generation…