It’s easier to disable all the garbage than remove the garbage?

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Apple computers, which is a higher market share than Linux, are more expensive. That’s what I was getting at.

    Windows became dominant because of enterprise software sales 20 years ago. Now everything runs in an electron wrapper that can run on any platform or in the browser.

    PCs don’t even have optical drives anymore. No normal consumer even knows how to install a program today, let alone is considering legacy program compatibility when making a computer purchasing decision

    I am qualifying my statements based on interactions with my coworkers of whom I deploy and manage their PCs. I could probably install mint on 50% of their PCs and the only reason they’d notice is because Microsoft office looks different and is called Libre Office for some reason

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        On purpose? Not likely. Also I don’t expect them to be able to handle save and open of files using the web versions of M365.

        But I think they would use libre office and not question that it wasn’t Microsoft office since it would open their files like they are used too.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Now everything runs in an electron wrapper that can run on any platform or in the browser.

      No. If it did Google would be winning with their incredibly weak Chromebooks.

      No normal consumer even knows how to install a program today

      What is a “normal consumer”? All of them? No. Enough of them that many platforms are dependent on that knowledge, yes.

      I am qualifying my statements based on interactions with my coworkers

      That sounds like an extreme bias.