These people are better at using AI than like 99% of everybody, since they are actually critically and carefully reviewing its output.
One of the big problems with actually using AI for work is that, even for people who carefully and critically review it, sometimes, it is just too good at making slop look like something real.
Some of the hardest part in software development are testing, validation, code review, is so tedious, the majority of people don’t like to do it so is hard to find qualified people and so on. This AI thing just put way more stress in the already dire part of the whole development.
These people are better at using AI than like 99% of everybody, since they are actually critically and carefully reviewing its output.
One of the big problems with actually using AI for work is that, even for people who carefully and critically review it, sometimes, it is just too good at making slop look like something real.
Also having the discipline to do an actual proper review of the output is hard. I bet that gets skipped s lot even for people who know better.
Some of the hardest part in software development are testing, validation, code review, is so tedious, the majority of people don’t like to do it so is hard to find qualified people and so on. This AI thing just put way more stress in the already dire part of the whole development.
our new manager changed our workflow so that all devs are responsible for merging into production for their feature
what this means now is a dev can create a pr, merge to our test environment, pass QA and he can merge straight into production
had our first vibe coded bug in production last week
I wasn’t involved in any of the reviews and previously I was the sole implementor and I would review everything