https://codeberg.org/rimu/pyfedi/src/commit/b168820a089ff6e835059f0d806f81b612987a79/app/models.py#L3513

A few people in the other thread assumed that it was required to fork the code to disable those filters. That’s not the case, the filters can be configured, and are off by default.

To hide the reputation system, here’s a line of CSS that admins can add in the admin area to hide it for every user

https://piefed.social/c/piefed_css/p/1722358/hide-red-triangle-warnings-on-accounts-with-bad-reputation

That CSS line can also be used by any user wanting to hide the score at the user level.

  • Rimu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Those checkboxes have been there since version 0.9. Ages.

    The problem with grabbing small snippets of code is a lot of context is lost. Don’t trust anyone who does that. PieFed has 50,000 lines of code so anyone showing you 50 lines is leaving out 99.9% of the picture.

    As I said a month ago, anyone with honest questions about how things work who wants to make PieFed better knows where to find us. You don’t have to be a coder, we need translators, designers, documentation writers, bug reporters, community evangelists and all that.

    • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Clean, simple code that is easy to understand and contribute to

      The problem with grabbing small snippets of code is a lot of context is lost. Don’t trust anyone who does that. PieFed has 50,000 lines of code so anyone showing you 50 lines is leaving out 99.9% of the picture.

      These 2 statements are incompatible.

      Plus depending on the snippets they definitely can tell how things work

      • wjs018@piefed.wjs018.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Previous threads about these filters were people complaining about them being hardcoded, completely ignoring that they are completely optional and off by default. It would go something like this:


        Look at this awful thing PieFed does!

        def do_the_thing():
            # relatively simple code that does the thing
        

        It completely ignored the context that the do_the_thing function is only called if the admin wants to do the thing.

    • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The 99% of the code does not deal with keeping Shadow Profiles on netizens and punishing them (as well as misinforming them about what’s going on). This 50something lines, does, and thus is a weighed key on which to judge the subject.

      , we need […] community evangelists

      What will they be commenting to the public on the CCP-like thing?

        • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Yeah. You know, Shadow Profiles? Datasets on users collected for the purpose of control and manipulation, basically the equivalent to back when McCarthynism and the FBI had a “dossier” on you. It’s not even that old, Facebook was caught doing it in a big scandal and pretty much every corporate since then (Reddit uses it for shadowbanning Fediverse mentions, etc).

          • Skavau@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            That’s not what’s being done at all here. It’s not that deep. It’s just a number based on downvotes received/given.