For AeronMelon@lemmy.world

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      The Borg got it right. Right angles are easier to build, and expand on. There’s no need for aerodynamics in space.

      Really, though, the most likely outcome is something like this:

      • SatyrSack@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Borg cubes also technically utilize a different warp technology than Starfleet vessels. Not to say the Starfleet warp tech requires an aerodynamic hull.

        • SaltSong@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          According to the TNG tech manual, the smooth curves of the ship makes it easier to maintain a warp field in a shape that uses less power while traveling at warp. So, not aerodynamic, but voidynamic, or something.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Iirc borg have transwarp as well as backup warp capability. And as to “how it works”: I was under the impression that, regardless of the type of warp reactor (federation dilithium/antimatter, Romulan microsingularity, whatever the borg use, etc) the main important output is a shitload of energy, and the thing generating the energy is largely irrelevant - all that matters is that an Alcubierre effect is generated, and serves as superluminal motive force.