Probably because no one else would agree to forge it, so he had to do it himself.

More like the judge saying, “I know this is a pretty cut and dry legal case, but I’m gonna do my part for my team.”

You say it was a coincidence, but how do we know that his name didn’t encourage his invention?

Maybe if his name was Thomas Cureforcancer we would be living in a very different world.

That comment really triggered you didn’t it. Sorry about that.

I don’t know, I think it’s a pretty common refrain.

Maybe not common in progressive social media circles.

Yeah, it would be. And my reply comment would also be the same.

Women: Why didn’t men ask women out anymore?

Also women:

The biggest problem with AI is that it has very poor “accuracy vs precision” problem.

It can be very precise with what it can produce, but it’s accuracy is completely unreliable.

So, as it stands right now, the only jobs it can really replace are jobs where accuracy doesn’t really matter all that much, like front end software/web development and art production.

“Feel the rhythm. Feel the rhyme…”

They don’t care. They need their anti-intellectualism as badly as fundamentalist Christians.

And your purity position is that a Nazi in power that threatens everyone is better than “not perfect”.

Progressive Puritanismtl is the reason why Trump got elected both times.

Neither Hillary nor Kamala were progressive enough so a large enough portion of people just didn’t vote.

Meanwhile, so Republicans always vote.

You just can’t help yourself.

Thank you for demonstrating the point in the most predictable way possible.

You see this readily on Lemmy.

I can be like, “I’m definitely pro-access to hormone treatments in most circumstances for adults, but I still think having transitioning a person’s sex is a big decision, should be made cautiously, and can have lasting psychological effects.” And I’ll get 100+ down votes.

There are several problems with the charlatans.

1. if you haven’t taken a science class since high school, then their advice often right. I’m amazed at how quickly the medical pseudo-science that flipped politically in my life time. I was raised in a deep red conservative Christian community and I don’t remember anti-vaccines ever being a thing for my community (we definitely had our issues, just not that one). The medical pseudo-science thing back then was firmly in the far left liberal sphere. The anti-vaxx movement was a hippy-liberal thing. (I’m not really sure when that flipped.)

2. The medical industry -including academia- is very much at fault in burning trust. There are many instances of the medical industry intentionally withholding treatments because a different treatment made them more money. Or doctors over prescribing in order to charge insurance companies more money.

3. A lot of what RFK jr says. Starts off good. He’s all like “Hey, we medicate too much. We should all focus on eating healthier and exercising. That’s what the government should encourage.” And even I’m like, “Yeah, okay. I agree.” Then he goes on to say “And that why you should shove a bowling ball up your butt.” That’s when he loses me.

I’m an environmental engineer and environmental scientist and I specialize in industrial hazmat waste issues, but I recognize even I’m a bit out of my professional lane on this.

But if you were to identify specific “toxins” that you are interested in “cleansing” there are often methods to do that. But first, I would recommend talking to a health professional. And those cleanses are going to vary significantly based on the toxin of interest.

But your best general “cleanse” is to eat more green leafy vegetables and exercise regularly. And feel free to drink a 4oz glass of milk a couple times a week.

Well, no. I don’t really watch his press conferences.

Is anyone surprised? I mean, did you guys think it was really a $300 million dollar ballroom?

If micro plastics were a problem then we should expect to see rapid increases in cancers in younger adults.

Handed a note

Huh. No shit.