Love this modern concept of equality. Instead of everyone becoming a better person, everyone feel free to be your worst self

There are hints in the article that the study was more detailed, so hopefully this is just a poorly written article trying to “dumb it down” too much

I meant fork, in the git sense. Scroll back to a previous point and take a different path. But yes, also back and forth

Nothing. Why do I need to manage storage myself? Everything i do should just be automatically saved. Each doc should essentially be version control so you can intelligently step back and fork if you need to.

Sure but you can’t follow someone else’s strategy when you’re not them and the market has changed.

Look at Slate as a possible alternative. Instead of blindly following teslas strategy starting withbhigh end vehicles and working your way down, they did their own market research. They identified an unserved market segment and designed a compelling product to serve it. We’ll see in a couple years whether it pans out for them

Or look at the plethora of Chinese manufacturers. They’re competing on both price and features. They went all in and went from starting later than legacy us manufacturers should have and quickly zoomed ahead.

Especially since we live in the northeast. He’s not driving anywhere there’s not good availability of trip chargers

It was strange talking to my brother about that - I showed him the data that last year I needed to use a supercharger three times in road trips, never more than 20 minutes. Otherwise I charge at home for half price. All those weeks of never going to a gas station are somehow outweighed by the very small number of times I need to charge in a trip.

I did eventually persuade him but he bought the Chevy behemoth Silverado because he thinks he needs to drive 7 hours at a stretch instead of five

Instead of trolling here with arguments outside the scope, take your discussion to @FuckAI

The problem is everyone else followed that.

That strategy worked great for Tesla. It’s seems valid for lucid, although too early to tell. It seems to be working for Rivian but 2026 is what will determine that. These are all early adopters who were able to make a compelling high end vehicle.

But it hasn’t been an effective strategy for legacy manufacturers, those who are late to the party, who are producing same old vehicles with different power train. They don’t seem to notice that too many of their attempts just aren’t compelling

But more importantly the market conditions have changed. There already are compelling high end EVs. They’re not going into an empty market, they are late. EVs have found a niche and companies are supplying it. But what hasn’t happened (at least in the us) is that breakout to mass acceptance. What about the rest of us?

If I want a $100k EV, I have choices so why would I buy some legacy manufacturers half asses first attempt?. If I want a $50k EV I have choices, including those which have already been refined through a couple generations. Cars are slowly working their way into the general market. But if I can only afford a $30k car, where are my choices? Why isn’t ford looking at that market? The market has changed: they need to do their own research and should have gone where the opportunity is rather than copy those before

While I guess I have to applaud the Lightning as an attempt to break open a new market segment, they should have known going in that these are your most conservative customers. They want what they got last time, they’re not trying anything new, and they’re not compromising even in features they never use. It was always going to be tough

The person donating decides what they wish to donate.

You’re confusing “way too women experience partner violence sometime in their lives” with “all men are violent criminals and need to be separated”.

While yes, a lot of drug related violence is caused by the drug war, the harm for drugs is easy to see from with a significant portion of the homeless, theft and ciolence as the worst addicts fall out of society, and ruined wasted lives. Harm for alcoholism is much more obvious and easy to see, but I’d also add all the victims of drunk driving to it’s harm

Statistically speaking the rate of abuse from men to their partners is extremely high.

No. Higher than the other direction but hardly extreme

Statistically speaking the harm from drug adficts and alcohol is is much higher

Me too, and I went my whole life that way, but the solution is easy, and worked every time so far

1. Nonstick pan (everything else is use cast iron)
2. American omelette, not French. Fold in half, not thirds
3. Don’t even try to fold it while cooking
4. Tilt the pan to slide it on the plate, but use that motion to fold the omelette in half

It’s even better for software, since now everyone regularly needs to learn a new code base. It’s a huge incentive to make code better quality and more maintainable

How are you distinguishing:

• it’s ok to treat all men as criminals who may attack women and women as victims who may be attacked so we need to keep them from fraternizing

From

• it’s not ok to try to reduce their self-destructive behaviors that are keeping them from being able to support themselves

It’s more like - I’ll help with the necessities to keep you alive. Anything extra is on you. We all have our vices but why should I pay for yours

deleted by creator

It doesn’t have to change anything in the energy market. All it needs is for someone in government to approve massive federal funding, then: PROFIT. I’m sure there’s no connection and no way anyone in Trump Media knows what will be approved by the Trump administrative

Cereal is worse. I used to get regular sized. Then I got family sized. Now I try to hold out for “mega sized” for myself

Fair enough, but I still wish I could give you UBI, free healthcare (including mental health and for gucks sake dental), and an opportunity at free college