That there is no perfect defense. There is no protection. Being alive means being exposed; it’s the nature of life to be hazardous—it’s the stuff of living.
I was surprised to see that their negotiations broke down because of price/cost as opposed to technology (unproven node and to my knowledge intel doesn’t really have any experience with semi-custom x86 business).
one of the top education videos on the front page is by an occultist about how the wrong witchcraft caused 9/11, another is how the vaccines are going to start killing babies, etc.
This is actually pretty funny. I am glad I am staying away from Odysee.
In general, I am rather skeptical of “free speech absolutism” and what have you, comes off a little parochial to me.
No, TSMC is not supposed to be a permanent solution. Just Arrow Lake.
This would be an excellent law/regulation that makes complete sense.
The major companies can most definitely manage this (although they will cry crocodile tears).
That’s definitely true.
The rested on their lawrels when they were the only game in town from the late 2000s to ~2018.
That would not be a good thing. The CPU/GPU design and semiconductor fab industries are already massively concentrated.
Microsoft CTO Kevin Scott is of course not a reliable source due to conflict of interest and his position in the US corporate world.
If anything, the fact that he is doing damage control PR around “LLM scaling laws” suggests something is amiss. Let’s see how things develop.
It is very likely.