7 million is a lot of people, but I doubt it’s enough to stop Trump.
This is about 2.5% of the population, and if we say about 1 in 10 who sympathize actually went, a rule of thumb that works for many situations, that means the opposition to Trump is only 25%.

I really really hope I’m wrong in this interpretation, so anyone with better knowledge on how these things work, pleas tell me I’m wrong.

On a more positive note, I think this is the biggest turnout yet.

This is complete bullshit, by someone who has a fixated idea but knows nothing.
At 70 break distance is longer, time to react is shorter, and collision speeds are higher. All factors that increase danger and damage.
You might as well claim that driving 250 is perfectly safe if everybody do it.
Obviously acceleration as in negative acceleration is greater in Collisions at higher speeds. You are either a troll or a very very illogical person.

The evidence is very clear that speed kills. You are spreading misinformation.

They simply don’t give a shit about decency.

Since this article is regarding USA, it’s worse than that. We are living in the golden age of insanity.
Delusional religious people and sociopathic Nazis have taken over USA.

For the civilized world there are warning signs, but insanity is unlikely to take control.

It’s similar to burning books IMO.
Buying something just to destroy it will always be moronic no matter what the item is.
It only accomplishes to make the company that makes those items make more money, so they can make even more items.

Way to go Jeanine Pirro, working to prove herself for the Nazis, and being a Nazi, before becoming the next Nazi victim.
How fucking stupid are these idiots?

No they are not both Republican, but they are both right wing.
But only one of them is fascist and anti democracy.

All the fascist Republicans crawling out from every creek there is. And dammit there’s a lot of them.
But it is no wonder, because you’ve had to be a psychopath for decades to be a Republican, and from psychopath to fascist is not very far.

With a fascist government anti fascism is an enemy of the system, and that is clearly where USA is today.

Mostly Free Markets regulated to some degree, but even communism although they don’t really have free markets, they still have markets and companies. They are just regulated by quotas instead of supply and demand. And economically that model simply doesn’t work. Just as a 1 party system has always shown to be authoritarian.

communism does not inherently mean authoritarian dictatorship

How does that work without fair elections?

Marx didn’t invent communism,

Maybe not, but his definition is the basis from which all others are derived. So any other form needs to be specified IMO.
I am very well aware that no 2 practical attempts at implementation are alike. Hell some of them aren’t anything more than simple dictatorships, like North Korea.

E.g. the UK is seen as a “democracy”

It’s basically as bad as USA, and also a dysfunctional democracy. They even had the chance to change that in a public vote, and the idiots voted against it!!

A FAIR democracy is a democracy where all interest groups can have representation, although you typically have a lower limit of 2-5% vote to get representation.
And where every vote is counted equally, so a vote in 1 end of the country counts as much for representation as a vote in the other end.
And representation is according to the populous vote and nothing else.

My perspective is that I don’t see democracy as any more virtuous than authoritarianism as a political system when elected officials aren’t serving the people’s interests.

Well technically it isn’t really a democracy then, because their job is to serve their constituents.
Of course the worse the democracy the more that can be the case. And USA is a very bad democracy.
Still even that was way better than not having democracy until the Republicans went full blown sociopathic, and was still rewarded government power.
Something I suspect will only happen in a very bad democracy without equal democratic representation by minor parties.

Marxist-Leninism

Yes Karl Marx actually defined socialism/communism, so if you use something else, it is not socialism or communism but something else.
Just like Social Democracy is VERY different from socialism.

The word socialism has changed meaning over time, it used to mean the same as communism, but now some people use it to mean Social Democrat, which is very confusing.

But there is no doubt about what Communism is, that term never changed its meaning, and Marxism is by definition what communism is.

Literally all communism is boiled down to is workers owning their workplaces cooperatively.

Not true, Communism also contain ideas about society, and that for instance child labor is illegal.

Completely wrong because it is both, communism is an alternative to democracy, all systems use capitalism in some way to function, even communism, the capitalist part is just extremely heavily regulated, and you don’t have free markets.
Communism was also traditionally called socialism, and the alternative to that is called social democracy, because contrary to communism/socialism Social Democracy is based on democracy, and not a one party system as Communism.

Yes that is absolutely insane and undemocratic.

Communism is one of the systems we know for sure demonstrably is worse for the general populace than democracy.
Others are Patriarchy and dictatorship.

Although for 50 years Americans have fucked up their democracy so badly, it’s beginning to look like it doesn’t matter.
But that is only until democracy is overturned, THEN it will show that democracy is obviously superior to the authoritarian dictatorship that is likely to come after.
Even a dysfunctional democracy like the American is better than any of the 3 mentioned above!

What would be better would be to strengthen democracy, and improve protections of citizens, and regulate capitalism better.
All of those are best done with a functioning democracy like for instance the Scandinavian model that is based on Social Demoracy.

Cooperations are legal entities, and in legalese that is called “a legal person”.
That is the case probably everywhere. Because that generally is part of how you take a company to court, and hold a company responsible.
But only in USA is it taken to such extremes that companies have for instance democratic rights, which is completely insane, because that is not what it is supposed to mean in a democracy.

I have no idea why they call it “integration”? It’s just a search option like any other search option.
Personally I have 10 search options enabled already, so this is number 11, and if I don’t like it, I will just disable it, which is dead easy to do, with a button for the purpose of changing settings right beside the search options.

I tried it for 2 terms I know very well, and the response was very good, but I would never trust an AI response without double checking.

You lose, I lose, everybody loses.