• 0 Posts
  • 242 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 1st, 2023

help-circle






  • The dynamic between “AI” boosters and people who don’t want to use LLMs is not on level ground. “AI” boosting in a space with people who want to be “AI Sober” is disruptive and antagonistic, knowing that you’re doing it is baiting or outright trolling.

    This is something I’ve wondered about with regards to all of this, especially in the open source community. If a large enough group of people thinks a project would be better with AI and the original project is resistant to it, then presumably by the general nature of open source they should be able to just fork it, make their AI version and see which is more popular. And if AI is so much better and faster, then that should rapidly become the dominant version.

    However, I don’t recall that happening with any projects I’ve heard of, and I don’t really hear about much forking going on. I’m sure it’s happened somewhere, but to me it seems like the vast majority of stories I hear are about existing projects suddenly being deluged with AI until they get overwhelmed, and then descending into flame wars when they try to do something about it.


  • Yeah that’s kind of where I’m at. KDE has been pretty right-on for as long as I can recall, and it looks like at the moment they’re just discussing AI broadly, which I personally don’t think is an unreasonable thing to do, but even that’s enough to get everyone riled up at the moment. Obviously if they actually do something sketchy like adding AI slop into Plasma then I’ll revise my opinion, but it doesn’t look to me like they’ve done anything especially egregious so far.







  • I have no idea if this is helpful or not (and sorry if it isn’t) but I generally tend to approach things as like:

    Can I do anything about it right now?

    If YES —> Do the thing ----> Don’t worry about it.

    If NO ----> There’s nothing to do ----> Don’t worry about it.

    Obviously that’s super simplified and doesn’t apply to everything, but I find it helps to just sift out the small-medium sized annoyances.

    So for example with your boat ticket:

    If you have proof you paid ----> Send proof -----> Nothing more to do.

    Could they reject it anyway? ----> Maybe but you can’t control that -----> Nothing more to do.

    And then if they do reject it, you can start the loop again from there, which I guess would either be escalate or just let it go etc.


  • This was the one I came to mention lol.

    You cannot buy the revolution. You cannot make the revolution. You can only be the revolution. It is in your spirit, or it is nowhere.

    Also from the introduction/short story The Day Before The Revolution:

    My novel The Dispossessed is about a small worldful of people who call themselves Odonians. The name is taken from the founder of their society, Odo, who lived several generations before the time of the novel, and who therefore doesn’t get into the action — except implicitly, in that all the action started with her.

    Odonianism is anarchism. Not the bomb-in-the-pocket stuff, which is terrorism, whatever name it tries to dignify itself with; not the social-Darwinist economic “libertarianism” of the far right; but anarchism. as prefigured in early Taoist thought, and expounded by Shelley and Kropotkin, Goldman and Goodman. Anarchism’s principal target is the authoritarian State (capitalist or socialist); its principal moral-practical theme is cooperation (solidarity, mutual aid). It is the most idealistic, and to me the most interesting, of all political theories.