Lucius Finkter

Lanyards? What the fuck is this referencing?

Disgust is an emotional response. No one can choose their emotions.

The no-paywall link doesn’t work.

Just the other day there was a post about whether Catholic priests giving confession should be legally mandated reporters of crimes that are confessed to them. Totally opposite vibe in this comment section.

It’s as if people think corporations should be less regulated than religions.

So poker isn’t gambling? Ok.

Add to the list “Deactivate Steam overlay”. That had fixed multiple games for me in the past.

Turnabout is fair play 🤷

The GOP is widely regarded as the party of homophobia. So it’s ironic that a Republican candidate would act this way.

The numbers on the clock have no effect on the amount of daylight.

So they can still target .00001 emissions, or net negative emissions. I suppose it’s fitting to get a nothing burger on nottheonion.

I though “accessibility” in video games meant, like, color blind mode and shit.

They are exploiting a vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to privileged information. Sounds hackery to me. It’s not their fault that Zuck made it easy.

Good guy Pyrrhus.

Just in case there any kilogenerians?

It’s not a good look for the party that is harping on the Epstein files to be reluctantly releasing redacted documents in responsive to widespread outrage.

There’s a difference between being funny and referencing something funny. This isn’t humor, it’s recall.

It says the program is opt-out. So no, they are not asking permission. They are informing you what will happen if you don’t intervene.

Morgan Stanley is not mentioned in the article.

Seems weird to call out a specific brokerage that doesn’t have any specific connection to Trump just to reference an advertisement from a quarter century ago.

I think omission can be used for misleading/deception, but that it’s distinct from a lie.