This is my main Lemmy account.

Here’s my backup account should something happen with this instance: https://lemmy.wtf/u/DFX4509B

  • 2 Posts
  • 180 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 2nd, 2025

help-circle





  • Well, if they want to make everyone either buy Rokus or watch YT either in Edge on Windows (the official way to watch Netflix on PC currently) or on another Android device than a Roku with the official YT app, they could just implement a full Widevine L1 lockdown, and sadly, just buying a Roku to watch YT on or watching it on a pre-existing Roku along with the paid streaming services, is probably what most people would actually do if they locked it down like that.

    Basically, Google would win the ad blocker and third-party front-end war by locking YT into pre-approved apps or devices, and as an added bonus (for them), they’d snuff out any competing platforms as Widevine L1 would also kill the ability to mirror one’s YT channel to one of the alternative platforms, and I guarantee most people who just post any random thing on YT don’t store their source video files locally to be able to to re-upload on PeerTube, Odysee, or Rumble, if anything, they’re likely just filming and posting straight from their phones.

    Now, the people with nice studio setups probably do have a local copy of their source files stored somewhere that they could re-up on their alternative platform of choice, but average Joes filming from a phone outnumber them.











  • That’s one thing PhantomStrider constantly makes a point of when reviewing XYZ kid’s flick or show; content aimed at kids, and in general, shouldn’t talk down to them like they’re stupid like, say, Dora does.

    Language like ‘unalive’ when referring to killing, for example, even in a totally legitimate manner taking on some inherently dark subject matter like with any True Crime stuff, could be construed as talking down, vs. just presenting the content straight-up and being as accurate to the subject matter and as respectful to the audience which might very much include the families of the victims of whatever crimes are being covered, as humanly possible.

    Like imagine pulling up a video essay on someone like Jeffrey Dahmer and having it be littered with language like ‘unalive’ and ‘grape’ when dealing with very, very serious subject matter like that, if I happened to be a family member of one of that guy’s victims, I’d feel very talked down to and be insulted as hell, plus it’s just not good optics to use language like ‘unalive’ when the subject matter you’re dealing with is very dark and serious subject matter.