oh, well, luckily its not illegal for researchers in the rest of the world to study gun violence in America.

yeah I think the real world is more complicated. Like, its not just about numbers, but also how control is implemented and even culture.

That is absolutely fucked up, but whats the relevance?

notice how in the graph on wikipedia, excluding USA, the correlation is really not that strong.

dont get me wrong, i agree with the general sentiment, but bad data weakens even the best of cases.

image

Google controls search results and has been caught meddling. Which negates the first two.

No it doesn’t negate the forst two. It only addresses the second, and bypassing the results completely, exascerbates the problem quite a bit.

Cry me a river.

great argument.

• It helps spread false information widely

• It puts a lot of control of information in a single companies hands

• It hurts the underlying sources

When google provides the info directly, and the first hand sources has become completely obsolete and shut down, what would new information stem from? It’s an inherently unstable and short sighted solution.

this is problematic on multiple levels.

sorry, I literally confused left and right just then ;p

but they are?

wha?

the face is switched yeah, that’s what I am referring to

You sure? this would be quite simple to whip up in photoshop

ground water is a completely different beast. This device harvests moisture from the air.

You are wrong on that last part

In accordance with Nobel’s will, the prize is selected by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, a five-member committee appointed by the Parliament of Norway unlike all the other awards chosen by the Swedish Nobel Committee.

It’s easy to crush the competition when you purposely take a loss as an investment in future market share.

no, but misuse, yes.

Those are illegal in most places, just fyi

yes???

[I was probably wrong, disregard]

That is not infinity, its undefined.

This only works if you use a one sided limit.