

Well, since there are alternatives that achieve the same, but invisible to the human eye, i still think its an annoying choice.


Well, since there are alternatives that achieve the same, but invisible to the human eye, i still think its an annoying choice.


I used to be curious about switching to proton
rexes are something else!
When I was little we had two devon rexes, both were the most bumblig idiot cats i’ve ever met <3


Well, I disagree but I get where you are coming from.


So, looking at that argument, you would give the same advice for a human?


it certainly hasn’t improved much since then.
I’ve heard the opposite talked about quite a bit.


“The Angels”
deleted by creator
deleted by creator


I choose to believe you meant to call autocorrect defiant :)


no, see, the bible prescribes stonings, not firing squads.


the Hennepin County workhouse
the what now?
*nasty chipses
Yeah, thats my understanding too. I just think the point would be better made with comparable numbers than with comparing apples to oranges.
for comparable numbers we have to control for amount of humans in proximity to sharks vs amount of humans in proximity to humans.
I mean, id still wager humans win out, but not nearly by as much.


what movie is this?
Hahah, that’s the one I was thinking of, though I couldn’t remember the origin, thanks!
or take 0.6+0.6=1.2 and round it to 1+1=1


Star Wars IS the past. It’s literally the first line in each movie.
heres one product https://www.birdshades.com/
I assume the others use relatively similar tech. Since human and bird vision doesnt line up perfectly, there are wavelengths visible to birds outside of our vision.