• 0 Posts
  • 103 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 24th, 2023

help-circle





  • Humanius@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldWhy, why, why…
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    They may also decide not to scale up production. After all, they just started making 2-3x on existing products.

    Another thing to consider is that the current spike in demand is almost entirely fueled by datacenters used for AI.

    It takes years to set up new manufacturing facilities, and the AI bubble popping is still going to happen at one point or another. They may simply decide not to increase manufacturing capacity because they believe that this spike in demand is temporary.

    Building new capacity costs money, and if the demand suddenly drops you cannot make that money back on sales.




  • There is a difference between human-scale and humanoid.

    Human-scale just means the robot needs to fit in a space where humans should also fit, while humanoid means it is supposed to resemble a humans not just in size, but also in shape. A humanoid robot would generally have a torso, two arms, two legs, and probably a head.

    As an example, a roomba fits in a human environment but is not humanoid. You could hypothetically make a humanoid robot that is capable of using an ordinary vacuum to vacuum the same space, but it would be significantly more complex and more expensive to do that. A purpose-built roomba is a much more cost-effective solution for cleaning up after humans.


  • Given that it’s a humanoid robot, I suspect that this is more of a marketing stunt than any practical deployment of robots.

    Humanoid robots don’t make a ton of sense in manufacturing. Why mimic the sub-optimal anatomy of a human when you can make your robotic work slave have any appendage you want, which are designed to be optinal for their task along the assembly line?

    Humanoid robots mostly only make sense in spaces that need to be designed for humans (like homes or hospitals) where the robot needs to regularly interact with human infrastructure.


  • Humanius@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldflock + ring = ice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Hypothetically the police could come with a warrant and force you to hand over the footage you recorded. It’s a higher barrier than if footage is being uploaded to the cloud, but it can still happen.

    And even if the cameras are not uploading their footage to the cloud, it still wouldn’t sit well with me if every other house has a camera pointed at the public street

    Where I live it is technically illegal to record the public street with an automated camera, but it’s not really being enforced. So there is Ring cameras everywhere.



  • I’m also Dutch and I still occasionally use it when I want to be polite to an older person I do not know very well, or to someone who is in a position where I want to show a certain form of “respect” (higher social standing?)

    That is probably also why the government uses “u” in its communication. It is proper to be seen as being respectful to your citizens. And saying “jij” after “u” is less likely to offend anyone than saying “u” after “jij”

    The rules are a bit vague when you are supposed to use it, and most people will go “zeg maar jij hoor” (you can say [informal] you) after you start with “u” (formal you)



  • The greenhouse emissions problem depends on where that garbage would otherwise end up, and what would happen with it.

    If the garbage would otherwise be recycled fully then incineration would seem like a worse option. But if the garbage would otherwise end up in a landfill, it leads to decomposition and methane production. Methane is one of the worst greenhouse gasses out there, so incineration might be preferable to just leaving it be.

    I’m no expert whatsoever, so take my comment with a grain of salt… I may be misinformed