• 1 Post
  • 153 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 14th, 2024

help-circle







  • arguing that decided cases are not “the gospel,”

    This is correct, but not in the sense that he provides. Society changes, what was okay before may not be okay now. Weighing precedent and modern society is a careful process. Tossing off precedent should have justification for why it’s being shrug and there needs to a preponderance that this is indeed the shift of society.

    Walking in and saying, “well we should just outright critical” is absolutely not the way to do it. Overturning previous case law should happen, but that shouldn’t be the fucking default. And when you do overturn previous case law, you really need to bring a fuck ton of support, not, “meh we changed our mind.” Being a contrarian for sake of rocking the boat isn’t how our highest court should operate.




  • Karlyn Borysenko. That’s the “expert” being talked about here.

    I think crazy undersells her.

    fascism might actually be our only option to actually defeat the left

    Now, my political stance aside, I think anyone who is in this mindset is someone who is having issues understanding how a Democracy works. Or Republic or whatever she is feeling like calling it today. She’s really famous for getting hung up on incredibly small details about words and what they mean. So meaningful debate with her is nonexistent.

    She’s definitely one of those all bark but if there was an actual outbreak of violence in this nation, be the first one on an airplane out of the country. So, to me at least, her opinion is vanishingly insignificant. Especially in the domain of how to approach any far end political group. Because, anyone who feels violence will solve something is someone who has no real solution.

    Also she gets super hung up on education and she should stop trying to be Governor or whatever aspirations she has, and go get on a school board or something. Being a talking head on Fox isn’t any kind of distinction, they have random people yapping all day on there.

    But her saying “Hitler went to heaven”, that tracks. It’s just that the color of the sky in her head is that special. Also, if there was a heaven and Hitler’s in it. I’ll be more than happy to take the opposite (which that’s the point of their argument that the opposite doesn’t exist, again special colors of the sky there). But her perspective of Hitler is mostly fueled with incredibly poor understanding of World War II. But there’s no point is discussing that matter with her because, you’d have a better chance convincing a wall that it’s a window.

    Again, it’s a lot to do with the whole “what do words actually mean?!” kind of argument with her. It tiring trying to ask her what the fucking weather is at the moment while you are both standing outside. She’s THAT kind of person to debate with. But it’s whatever, takes all kinds to make the world go round. I wouldn’t invest a hay penny in anything she has to say, but everyone is free to do whatever they want.


  • European e-waste campaigners are calling on EU leadership to force tech vendors to provide 15 years of software updates, using Microsoft’s plan to end Windows 10 support next month — which may make an estimated 400 million PCs obsolete — as a textbook case of avoidable e-waste.

    Windows 10 has already had 10 years of support. ESU extends this one extra year. If you have hardware that cannot meet Windows 11’s requirements, there are other OSes available that will happily run on that hardware. Which is what brings us to the real issue.

    Microsoft’s near monopoly on consumer grade PCs and Apple’s vendor lock in. This is the core issue.

    Companies can do this because there are no regulations to stop them. We call on European Commissioner Jessika Roswall to introduce EU Ecodesign requirements for laptops, guaranteeing at least 15 years of software updates. No more devices designed to break or become obsolete before their time

    Ten years is a very long time for support. If you need support past that length, you need a different OS. Apple does good to keep Macs made in the last five to seven years still able to run their newest OS. They are some of the worse offenders on this. But even with a different OS, there’s still a limit to how far you can take hardware. You could put the best optimized software on really old hardware and that won’t change that the underlying CPU is old.

    The older hardware gets the harder it is to keep supporting it. Case in point, there reason you can’t get TLS 1.2 that pretty much every site now requires onto Windows 95 era machine is the underlying hardware cannot keep up with the required computational needs to support that encryption. And if you happened to install Windows 95 onto modern hardware, the number of changes to the OS to get access to the underlying hardware is pretty much an upgrade to Windows 7.

    Ten year old machines are doing alright for the time being, but we have to move on. TLS 1.3 is here, has been here since 2018. The stricter requirements for security, require more advanced hardware.

    And I just mention TLS as a single example of what we’re talking about here. Modern hardware advances and attackers and users get those at the same time. While software security schemes do ensure security long after the hardware has become dated, there’s a point where it won’t matter anymore what software you toss onto the machine. It’s just so out dated it doesn’t matter, no software is securing it. Now that’s usually a lot longer than ten years, but it’s not much longer.

    You can take a very lightweight Linux distro and pop it onto a Pentium 3 machine. It will technically run. But you are lacking SSE2 and even if you recompiled to remove SSE2 optimizations and strictly held to 586 ISA, you’re not going to enjoy the performance on the machine. For even the most simple tasks like unpacking a 7-zip. You will fare very unwell to some attacker who has a modern Threadripper machine.

    I love old machines but the rest of the world is moving forward. Yes, software could technically cover for more than ten years, but not much more. But it’s silly to think that a Athlon 64 (2003), the oldest CPU you can technically get working on Windows 10 because of the NX bit requirement, would be able to keep pace on today’s multi megabyte sized website. Hell even the X2 models that were the first to be “dual core” would have issues with how modern web browsers handle things because Athlon 64 X2’s model for multiple processors is vastly different than how modern CPUs do it. It wouldn’t take anything for someone to feed it a website that would bring the system to it’s knees.

    The thing is 15 years a very long time in the world of technology that’s ever evolving. Software can only go so far. 15 years is absolutely you need a different OS if that’s your requirement territory. But when you start hitting 20 years, your going to see breakage no matter what software you throw at it. It might be very slight at the 20 year mark. but each year after that it’s going to become more pronounced.






  • That is specifically at the request of the president, who understands that in the hot temperatures down here when something is painted black it gets even warmer and it will make it even harder for people to climb. So we are going to be painting the entire southern border wall black to make sure that we encourage individuals to not come into our country illegally

    What happens when they have oven mits or you know, just gloves, or just wait until night when the metal is cooler and they have cover of night?

    Whatever, I guess I shouldn’t care about that $500+ million that goes to put on a single coat that peels off six months later because they didn’t prime the surface.




  • The [Trump] administration claims to be pro-family, but is screwing a lot of people over – including ones with families, including ones who want to build a family

    Yes, that is the point. This administration honestly believes there isn’t enough stupid people who will work for pennies in a factory. This is literally according to plan for them. This to them IS IN FACT being pro-family. This is literally how they see it.

    You work a back breaking job, so you have to have a couple who work it just to survive, you have children who won’t go to school but instead will work in the factory as well. All your family forever working back breaking work. That’s what pro-family means to these people.

    Like I grew up on a farm. I had to pull hands of tobacco, I had to pick blackberries, I had to setup cows for milking, I did things that I’m surprised I lived through. And my family honestly believes that all made me a better person and they didn’t like the fact that I left all nonsense when I could. They honest believe I’m a worse person now because I’m not having my third heat stroke like everyone ought to be at my age.

    THIS IS WHAT PRO-FAMILY MEANS TO THEM. Suffering IS pro-family. Being under thumb and never being able to get ahead IS pro-family to them. It’s wild I know, but somewhere in their brains this is how you show you really, really, really love someone and care for them. By making them suffer.

    This administration is indeed being exactly their version of pro-family. This is what they define as being pro-family. It’s insanity to say the least, but this is honest to goodness what they see as helping people. That “screwing a lot of people over” that is exactly what Trump and his voters see as being helpful, kind, caring, loving, and pro-family as it comes to them.

    Screwing people over, fucking their lives up, and being completely shit, is this weird “tough love” mindset. Suffering is love to them. I don’t know how much clearer I can make it for people. But there are folks who honest to goodness believe that you have to suffer your entire life to know love. That, that suffering IS LOVE.

    And those people are the ones running this place.