- 0 Posts
- 75 Comments
8·20 days agoQuantum Scientists: Hey, man, you just don’t get it.
Hipster Artists: Hey, man, you just don’t get it.
351·26 days agoAll analogies have flaws. If they didn’t, they wouldn’t be an analogy, they would be describing the very thing itself.
Wait, is it the boat that ignores the spherical attribute or the entity that commands the boat?
Can an elf sail to the undying lands commanding a human built vessel?
42·4 months agoWhat’s in my pants is whatever the fuck I tell them is in my pants.
We have conceal and carry laws for this exact reason. /jk
This will cover up so many dusty farts.
Reference: https://youtu.be/8QFPRuzmsBA?t=109
Regular sleep schedule - good
People get to the weekend and think they’ll get away with staying up late and sleeping in.
It’s not worth it.
Nah, to get hairs you need to send back French toast. Just like in this demonstration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNfciDzZTNM
Doesn’t matter if it was one, or all publishers. Always call out scummy practices.
Yeah, it’s strange to label it as “not threatened” when there is a “data deficient” label available.
It appears that the “data deficient” label is avoided as much as possible:
https://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/science-and-technical/sap244.pdf Page 27
Too many cooks spoil the broth.
6·4 months agoFollow the money. Where do the tariffs end up?
Wouldn’t that be “are you DNA helicase, because I want you to unzip my genes?”
If the other person is the enzyme, then they are the unzipper.
Per the article, they
justdeveloped a faster algorithm for a specific type of material simulation.You’re underplaying it.
As per the article:
This has broad implications for industries that require detailed material analysis, including:
Aerospace and Defense: Improved modeling of material stress and failure in aircraft structures.
Engineering and Manufacturing: More efficient testing of materials for construction and industrial applications.
Military Research: Faster development of impact-resistant materials for defense systems.
This is why:
“It ain’t stupid if it works.”
is fundamentally incorrect.
6·6 months agoThe one you use.
I think it’s a joke. Instead of “The God Particle”, it’s “the dog particle”.
27% of 8 hours is approximately 2 hours and 10 minutes. That’s about right.