This is the most poorly worded title…
This is the most poorly worded title…
Right, it’s the same kind of stupid outrage like the Obama “tan suit” scandal.
It’s just there to stir up those that are already against the person.
Yeah no need to go that far for a forum reply. I can dig if I feel compelled lol
That all definitely makes sense. I’ve heard of a few sects doing shunning and segregation of members perceived to have sinned. It’s a horrid practice that I assume is better serving to drive people away than encouraging them to come back. But your community abusing you like that can have a potent enmeshment effect too. Especially if the relationship was always perceived as close and good.
Thanks for talking about it. Seems a good group to avoid.
Can I ask about the Seventh Day Adventists? I’ve run into a few over the years but never had issues and don’t know much of them. Is what they did more than personal? If so I’d like to avoid them too. I have precious little patience for bad religious nonsense.
Firefox and Firefox Focus
I was going to link it if no one else had. Glad I wasn’t the only one that recalled that lol
Wow, was waiting on the pro to drop, but now I giess I’ll just pass the ps5 generstion altogether. This sucks ass.
One sure sign that you’re not masculine, is doing things to show others how masculine you are.
They have to convince the AI that there are 3 R’s in strawberry
That’s stupid as hell. They think a bunch of kids are just going to sit there and listen to a robot? They don’t expect them to take advantage of every flaw in AI? Not only that but it removes the human interaction element of development. And to just top it off, AI is so basal right now that it will most likely teach students erroneous information anyways. Why are so many influential people with money complete morons?
It’s usually that they seem to block the main channels and the small ones that don’t know what they are talking about slip through. Going to get some kids hurt doing this.
As I said, it could have been phrased better. But the take away I was trying to communicate is that they aren’t intending to offend by including the deadname. It’s just there for context and not something to be offended at.
It was there for context. No one knows Cara, so it wouldn’t have made sense without knowing their former name. Maybe it could’ve been phrased better, but it is relevant information for context.
Ooo what if we had a federal administration that covered the national aeronautical and space needs of the country…