Well, using the administration’s covid response as a benchmark, his goons don’t seem to care overly much about how much harm they cause.

That was all for “personal use”.

Or you’ll do what?

He’s going to ignore it, so you might as well just jump ahead to the enforcement step. There’s going to be an enforcement step, right?

What you’ve presented is not a solution.

That ??? is doing a lot of work.

No, we’re not, but we don’t know what to do. Do you?

Immortality is such a mixed bag depending on the exact mechanics behind it.

You simply won’t die of old age, but can be killed by anything that would kill a normal person? Probably fine.

Almost any other interpretation opens the doors for some absolutely horrific states of being that you’re just unable to escape from.

Also maybe helpful for people with traumatic chest injuries that make it difficult, painful, or internally harmful to breathe normally.

Watermelons

My first thought, too, was “That’s an odd choice of wording”, but… it’s exactly what it sounds like.

[…]But when the bill stands it looks positively inflated, almost as if the video generator used to make Cuomo’s ad was trained on MPREG fetish art of the bill and not the original cartoon itself. The thick and luscious red lips are present whether the bill is leaning or standing.

Towards the end of the ad, an anthropomorphic phone with a ChatGPT logo wanders into the scene. Standing next to the pregnant bill, I could not but help but think that the phone is the father of whatever child the bill carried.

My observation led to an argument in the 404 Media Slack channel and opinions were split. “It does not seem pregnant to me,” said Emanuel Maiberg.

Jason Koebler, however, came to my defense. He circled the pregnant belly of the cartoon bill and shared it. “Baby is stored in the circle area,” he said.

Well, that reminder just ruined my morning.

I mean honestly, that’s a super high quality website for someone her age to have made by herself in the (presumably) mid-late 90s.

Also, wonder if she meant alcoholics.

Or she thinks it’s still 1970 and someone can have a reasonable work-life balance while still providing “emotionally and physically” for a family as the sole breadwinner.

It’s only really noteworthy because it affects everyone at the same time. If everyone had an individual outage for the same duration at a random time, it wouldn’t even be noticeable in most cases.

The ‘problem’ where Wikipedia doesn’t allow conservatives to edit in propaganda and disinformation as much as they’d like.

That movie had some surprisingly funny scenes. I didn’t expect a whole lot going in, but it did exceed those expectations.

I’m not familiar with open typer, klavaro or gnu typist, but there’s nothing particularly complicated about making a typing game. However, you simply aren’t providing enough information for anyone to really be able to offer advice. What are you actually needing help with? Do you have any sort of plan for how you want this hypothetical game to work?

Sounds like the solution is for you to just start your own instance, create your own ‘free speech zone’ communities, and engage in a ‘censorship-free’ policy there. Personally, I prefer to stay as far away from instances hosting, for example, CSAM and unbridled hate-speech as I can, and the current federation system handles that quite well.

Maybe my lack of understanding stems from a misunderstanding of OP’s post… which to be fair, I found fairly difficult to parse, and based on their responses to your and other posters’ replies, I strongly suspect that’s a ‘them’ problem, not a ‘me’ problem, as it seems everyone else is having an equally hard time understanding what they’re actually trying to say.

I just want to be clear that it is a lack of understanding and not an attempt to be antagonistic. I have no inherent problem with you; we have strongly differing views on a number of important topics, but we seem to be able to co-exist on Lemmy (and even post in the same communities) just fine, which… seems to be a counter-point to OP’s post? But maybe I’m just still misinterpreting what that point actually is.

What I say isn’t censored

What you say aligns with what’s considered acceptable viewpoints on that instance. Take those views to another instance that aligns with different views and you’ll be censored, just like someone expressing dissenting views on lemmy.ml will be. I’m not sure I understand what point you’re trying to make here.