I think a lot of this comes down to the semantics of “intention”.

I intended to write line 152 exactly as written. I intended to write code that compiles. But that pesky compiler imposes reality on me when it says “bug on line 152”. Did I intend to write the bug?

Similarly, a politician may make a public promise on the campaign trail. They may truly intend to fulfill that promise, but political reality stops them when they are elected. There are hundreds of possible reasons for failure: poor planning and naivety, lack of political capital, or even accepting a lobbyist’s bribe. Which of these cases should be considered lies?

Politicians work product is not information, it is legislation.

“Politician that never lies” is like “Developer that never writes bugs”. I want to live in that world too, but it is a fantasy world.

It is absolutely disgusting how you talk about an ongoing genocide.

Misinformation Bot says that WaPo is left-center lmao. Absolutely ridiculous.

Boston Globe is left-center? Yikes, more misinformation from the conservative bot.

I’m not sure if they are a russian shill, but unfortunately they are telling the truth. Democrats have often employed the pied piper strategy, and it has come back to bite them a few times.

It was probably most famously used when Hillary Clinton boosted Trump, because he seemed to be the weakest Republican primary candidate at the time. How the Hillary Clinton campaign deliberately “elevated” Donald Trump with its “pied piper” strategy

Democrats are still boosting and supporting extremist Republicans now. The risky strategy Democrats are using to win elections

Your data does not logically lead to your conclusion, because the polls cited naturally bifurcated the responses into two (or three) camps.

It’s like if I did a poll asking: “what is your favorite color, purple or yellow?” and then said this proves that 50% of respondents’ favorite color is purple. We are discounting the opinions of orange and green lovers.

So it sounds like theres 3 steps here:

1. Campaign receives large donation from wealthy donor
2. Campaign spins up an advertising campaign, encouraging potential donors by saying they will get matched from funds in step 1
3. Campaign receives donation from small donor.

Yeah that kinda sounds like bs to me. There are 2 donations, and an advertising campaign. No extra money is generated by the “match”.

A different dataset would be an improvement, but you will have an uphill battle getting it changed.

This bot is created and operated by the admins here at lemmy.world and they appear to have a financial stake in MBFC.

NPR is left center too? Lol

MBFC is garbage propaganda.

Omfg the stupid misinformation bot thinks CBS news is left-center lmao

Why even post if you’re going to include absolutely no information?

What a garbage bot.

Misinformation bot thinks ABC news is left center lmao.

Sadly the only reason its here is because lemmy.world admins are being paid by mbfc :(

Misinformation Bot For Chuds

It’s hard to imagine a person over the age of like 25 that is truly undecided.

I think the real demographic in question is thinking something like this: should I go vote to help stop the madman Trump, or should I just not bother because the Democrats are aiding and abetting a genocide?.

Sadly, Harris and Biden continue to push away these critical voters.