I see a lot of oversimplifying analogies in the comments, but in my opinion none of them take into account that users of AI don’t know how it works or its risks, and some AI like Grok offers inherently problematic and potentially harmful/illegal functionality
That shortened headline phrasing is semantically ambiguous. With context it’s clear, but it can also be read as “Meta has caught paying nazis in order to post on Facebook”
You say I perfectly summarized it, but to be honest, I haven’t even read the article… I am familiar with the topic at least and just put my thought about it into a laconic comment.
Generally one should only comment on an article after actually reading it.
Weaponized masculine insecurity
I have almost never purchased any games from all these shady companies like EA/ActiBliz/Sony/Microsoft. I usually prefer indie games and buy DRM-free stuff from GOG whenever possible. Yet, ironically it feels like I’m not doing my part because I have nothing to unsubscribe from or start boycotting.
I guess spreading the word is also a way to contribute.
Thanks for the advice, creepy sheepy
Yeah, be wary of lizard people
The concept of assists makes it even more interesting. I can think of a bunch of people who would have a huge number.
No need for that because by definition it’s only displayed above people’s heads. You can tell someone isn’t human if nothing is displayed over them.
This reminds me of this animated YT video in which timers are displayed above peoples’ heads that show the amount of seconds passed since that person last shit their pants: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/WgbI5orsSMY
Over night, social hierarchies are upturned, respect is earned and lost based on that number.
We shall garg on deez nutz