Am I the only one who read the article, and has no idea what the hell they’re talking about?

I honestly think the vast majority would drop him. Its their hard line. For now they’re denying he’s in there. But hia plummeting popularity show that some republicans are in agreement that trump is guilty. Which is why they’ve stopped supporting him in recent years.

So I think his base would dramatically shrink. But not die.

Not going to read the article. I’m just going to say that we live in the dumbest timeline.

Alright. Thats it. I’ve had enough of these territory disputes. I declaire all of existence to be my territory. Yep. Every single atom that exists. All mine. I own everything now.

And for anyone who wishes to dispute this, the process is simple. Just take a number, use your toungue to write out a letter of dispute, directly onto my butthole! Anyone who doesn’t do this respects my claim to everything.

Nope. Not really. All this random multitasking, all the constant never ending bullshit. It’s all actually 1 task.

That 1 task is called “Distract everybody from the epstein files”

Ya know? Most of the time I don’t get to say this, but I think if the fediverse had a MySpace type service, I think the fediverse version might actually out-perform the official real version of MySpace. Which would probably be the thing that makes some corporate entity try to sue the fediverse.

Now in theory, MySpace can’t sue this Fediverse version of MySpace. For clarity sake, let’s call this fictional version of MySpace “FediSpace”.

So if MySpace tried to sue FediSpace, we all know that the decentralized nature of the fediverse should make that more or less impossible. But how would it hold up in real life? You can make all the laws you want. You can plan your government to run however you want. If the last few years have taught me anything it’s that none of that matters. If the people with money want to win, the courts are not an obstacle. They will make shit up, ignore shit, do whatever they can so the company with the money wins in court.

I just have no idea what that would look like. I don’t rule out the possibility, but I think it would require thousands of lawsuits. And I don’t see MySpace footing the bill for that. So I have no idea how to imagine it.

Oh god not again!!! MySpace Tom is about to kidnap people in vans, and shoot innocent people on the street while taking no responsibility in the slightest.

What? That’s what happened last time someone trying to make a comeback said that. Look what happened within a year.

Well clearly nothing could go wrong with that, right? …right?

I was actually going to reply back with a quote of your post

then it wakes up and decides humans are the problem.

And I was going to say “Fair point”. But now reading your full comment, I see you’re already in agreement.

Not sure how one relates to the other, but I’m down. I’m also going to dress like a pirate.

…what? I said I don’t know how any of this relates to the other. Are we NOT just doing random stuff that makes us feel good?

peels mark zuckerbergs skin off

Hey did you just know this guy is actually a robot? Uhhhh…wait, isn’t this how the terminator movies started? The elite using robots to control the masses?

I think the idea is that OP thinks 102 million is either equal to or more than what he would have paid in taxes. It’s not.

I’ve looked at my paycheck and done the math. Every paycheck I get taxed roughly 17%.

I don’t know this guys annual income, but I’d be willing to bet if he had to pay a fair 17%, he would be paying a LOT more than 102 million.

So it got posted because at some point, the wealth of these people gets hard to comprehend just how much it is, because its hard to imagine having even a fraction of that money.

The jam should be white with black spots.

I’m imagining it like a scene from Aqua Teen Hunger Force. You’re meatwad. Playing with potatos, and imaging they’re expensive electronics. But it’s just potatoes with magic marker drawn on them to look like a cell phone, and a PC.

I thought it was a riddle that I didn’t understand. But I also thought “photos” said “potatos” until I zoomed in.

So. Riddle. How do you move your potatos from your phone to your PC?

Government: Describe how they opened the artificial tubes of intelligent internet.

AI companies: Oh. It would appear we can lie our asses off, because these dustpiles don’t understand the core concepts at play here…

AI companies: They used a zappy gun. Which is why we need to install mass surveilance on every phone and street corner to find all the zappy guns.

Government: My god!!! Those zappy guns go pew pew pew and now everyone knows I wear pink panties and a dog collar in my wifes basement! Fund the AI immediately!

Old man yells at cloud.

Or at this point, old man yells at anything to distract you from the epstein files.

Hell it’s the only place I’m okay with something up my ass.

Psssshhhhhh! Prude!

Btw, I’m not defending these doctors with the glasses. Fuck that shit! That should absolutely be banned.

I’m just saying anal is awesome! You’re missing out.

I guess that makes sense when it’s explained like that.

But a million guesses, and I never would have got that right.

When I was a kid, I didn’t understand a lot. Everytime I asked a question, the adults in the room would say “you’ll understand when you’re older”.

Ok. It’s been like 38 years…I still don’t understand.

What exactly is Dee Snyder supposed to be with this look??? If this look were invented today, I would think he’s mocking trans people. But this was the mid 80s. I never in my life heard the term “trans” until maybe 2010. So in 1985, they weren’t a focal point of society. If they existed at all they were very rare. Not well known enough for an anti trans image to make sense in 1985.

So, what is he supposed to be with this look? A caveman??? A manniquinn??? I have no idea what I’m he’s going for here.