He also said he wanted housing costs to go up, I wonder who that might benefit.

There’s really no question he committed a federal crime. I’m unclear whether or not there are additional crimes.

I haven’t misrepresented anything but in do love summer ad hominem.

I don’t know that’s why I asked you what crime he is guilty of because you’re speaking like you know even after admitting you didn’t read anything about it.

So was the sa, you’re describing the brown shirts.

What federal crime exactly, be specific in your admittedly uneducated bullshit.

Keep in mind you already said you didn’t know much about this particular situation.

Collective guilt, surely that’s never been used by bad people for bad purposes.

“I didn’t do any research but here’s my uniformed opinion on why this isn’t as bad as it sounds.”

The judge can’t, it’s not that they won’t. It’s portrayed in the media as refusal but if you actually read what’s in pacer you’ll find out that’s not the case.

Reinstatement would also be challenging, because the Senate has begun confirming some of their successors.

Yeah that doesn’t change the fact they were removed illegally nor does it have anything to do with the judge being a factor.

They don’t need to at this point and it would behoove them to wait as long as possible because back pay is from the time of notice, the judge is technically just helping them make a case for far more backpay.

The judge didn’t refuse to reinstate them they ordered the white house to and the white house refused, that’s why they’re being sued.

That’s not new, he’s getting sued by a handful of them.

Ok.

No one said that. But it’s inarguable that the Democratic party is in large part responsible for people not wanting to vote for the candidates they put forth knowing full well we want an actual lefty and not a corporate business monster.

Did I say that? No you’re conflating.

Yes it’s the individuals that are the problem not the party that chains to be left but sides right every single fucking time.

That would make the oig as conflicted as the IRS commissioner in which case it would dump out to Congress to choose.

That said the oig for Treasury is a very large office for an oig and that’s a very tall tree to chop down by millimeters, trump would be dead before all conflictions are litigated.

Dumb people love memes, look at this administration for example.

The oig isn’t and the oig is who would appoint outside counsel since everyone involved in conflicted.

He didn’t, and they didn’t. He certainly threatened to I’ll give you that.

The IRS oig.

That’s not an argument.

It’s literally the definition of domestic terrorism even pre 9/11 and nuh uh against facts is a bad argument.