You could add the fact he says he was elected 3 times which isn’t legal, it’s phrased as elected twice makes you ineligible to hold office on a third election. Doesn’t say anything about actually taking or holding office.

Yes it is, and Confederate creeps are a much bigger much older cult.

It would be difficult for them to pull off even now, tell a bunch of South shall rise again types that they’re throwing states rights under the bus and suddenly they aren’t on their side anymore.

Sure, I don’t disagree but Peter theils bitch isn’t in the know or calling the shots, he’s just a loudmouth puppet.

Well justice is a weird word to use. Morality is more consequential when talking about convictions and people often conflate the two.

It’s justice it’s just not particularly moral justice.

Let’s start with being “brought to justice”, that’s a fairly vague concept. I said he could be convicted in absentia. Done, that’s where your confused.

https://lemmy.world/comment/21464363

The start of the comment chain for reference.

No one said that in fact I said just the opposite, don’t be obtuse.

It’s literally virtue signaling, taking that particular plane implies they’re ready for war be it South America or Greenland.

Yeah stupid people say stupid things, what exactly about that is new or surprising, moreover what does it change?

They can protect him from federal charges but not state ones or they would wipe state sovereignity and all the big guns and fun weapons are on the coasts.

No, he sent it to someone and they found out. It’ll get out anyway and it plays more in their favor for it to be released by them first before they have to prove where he sent it to.

It doesn’t need to, Minnesota submits warrants to ice, dhs, doj and the last three known addresses for the shooter and they’ve satisfied the in absentia exception and they can then complete a trial without him. If convicted he’ll risk arrest and imprisonment and they can’t leave the country, most other countries won’t accept anyone with an active felony case let alone conviction and they’d probably enjoy the extradition.

Cover the photo and if they call you on it pull out the fucking receipt.

Who’s got money on them not even being Venezuelan.

Trial in absentia is a thing as well.

That’s what will likely happen and she’ll get sanctioned along with her office.

No need to, it’s just that district taking a loss on every single case they bring. Eventually having ineffectual prosecution for an entire district will cause the administration huge issues for being weak on crime.

So again, not big enough for you.

They’re are still protests literally every day.

I’m not, I’m drawing the logical conclusion to your argument. Large sustained protests generally turn violent so you’re calling for open revolt.

It’s not whatever decouple as much as you’d like you’ll still see the backlash of whatever happens here. Similarly no one asked you, you offered your opinion so clearly it does matter to you and isn’t “whatever” just be honest in what you’re saying.

Yeah just ignore the fact that the largest protest ever isn’t big enough for you.

You’re after open revolt, just say it and at least be honest. You’ll still be an armchair revolutionary but at least a slightly less pathetic one.

They’re not though.

And we had the largest protest in American history like 5 months ago.

So again you’re uninformed or backing open revolt.

You gotta pull together with others and work as a group to fight back.

There have been protests nearly every single day since he took office. We’re already grouped together fighting back so you’re either uninformed or you’re calling for open revolt.

So which is it.