Pomal

Based on the time in role for the OP of the linked article, I’d venture to guess they aren’t wasting people’s time.

Do it, tending nature is a lot easier than attempting to herd cats that think they’re the honest thing since sliced bread and their code would never fail.

We’re seen as the problem, who only dredge up trash, without recognition of the cleanup in our wake.

They were self selecting by not even catching interviews, even after using utilities to reformilate their resumes for ATS.

s/but, that outweighs/but, that doesn’t outweigh/

In the US right now economy, I do agree that it can be a negative signal for employers when quantifying cost but, that outweighs their inherent value of prior vetting done by a major organization. However, if a candidate employee does apply for a role they are more than likely well aware of the possible salary range for the role - pending their states laws around pay range posting requirements. Companies hiring for software developers are mostly already complying with these requirments, as any survey across open roles can tell you.

But that first half is a reminder (to myself) that not everyone deserves constant good will or benefit of the doubt. Folks like Kissinger definitely would have gleefully eradicated Haiti (if not turned into a plantation-as-country) and folks who hold offsets of his ideals do not need to be given any sort of grace.

If you think his writing is any of what you posit, then I’d recommend taking a look in the mirror to search for your humanity.

Sorry I didn’t cherry pick the fifth to last essay?

Sauce? I read through several posts on the blog and didn’t find what you’re talking about

Just watched several friends take two+ years to get a job, with FAANG on their resume and over a decade of experience, in the US. You probably have some selection bias.

They have to lower their standards so those halls can be filled with Oathkeepers once more.

Meanwhile, in every election I’ve voted in since the 00s, US republicans have consistently deployed this as a tactic. They really need to get over themselves, their prissiness is showing.

While you’re against boring, have you considered whittling?

Can infrastructure providers start dedicating their knowledge of scraper infra to the public domain so we all can start to respond appropriately to these toxic networks?

I gave the example of PPPoE, the other option is to read the linked kernel docs to understand traffic steering and infer where those situations could occur.

Opensense is often bound by single-core operations depending on where a network packet may plumb itself through the kernel. A great example is any PPPoE connections on the base OS BSD. Vyos doesn’t have these same limitations since it’s minted on Linux - which supports traffic steering.

Really though, IaC for vyos has always been rock solid. Even though the persistent config in Opnsense is cool, adding new features or configs can be a bit of a pain in the ass

It’s important to differentiate because they’re rankly two seperate topics - where the authors sole intent is to shill out LLMs. The only time he reference’s ML is while speaking of the Chemistry Nobel, with a personal blog tailored to technical people. So…. Disingenuous.

This article conflates the disdain for corporate entities shoving LLMs everywhere with the underlying mathematics that drives their machine learning algorithms, and labels everything as AI without a lens of criticality.