Nobody likes a sucker, especially the kind that fall for fruit tarts like you. I knew there was trouble. I could smell it on the hot evening breeze. Fortunately for me, trouble is my favorite thing… Because I’m Joe Milkshake. I kicked down the door with one swift, decisive motion.
Thankfully?
Edit: woah, what a novel below me. I don’t want him dead either. But the headline would have worked perfectly without this one word. Including it makes it just weird.
Yet Jellyfin has no financial issues and even asked people to stop donating to them but to support other projects instead.
Honestly, just “lol” works as well.
Fuck me, I never thought I would live to see the day. And all of it so much on point. Please be successful.
Thank you! Also thanks for not getting discouraged to answer by all this comment mess.
I am out of the loop, what’s that about
Would be nice if you could elaborate what exactly you did different than all the others?
Edit: jeez, guys. It was just a question since they said “none of the others met their needs” so I was interested in that? Did that sound that rude? I am not a native English speaker, so I am not sure now. They are completely OK to ignore my question. But cool, will not ask that again and ignore such posts in the future.
Quadruple dipping because they publish both open access journals that authors pay extra for, plus the standard subscription journals where universities need to pay for access too. Subscription obviously never got cheaper, no matter if the amount of open access journals increased (didn’t check that though, but fits well into the scheme)
I can hear this image
I’m not American and I disagree with everything you wrote.
Guess we’re not pooping for 3 days.
There is no such thing as a line, it seems to be a long gradient and its about how fast you move on the gradient. If you ever so slightly introduce more and more crap slowly enough, people don’t care as they forget how good they had it much earlier.
The longer they discuss the less it is allowed.
I let you in on a secret: scientific literature has its fair share of bullshit too. The issue is, it is much harder to figure out its bullshit. Unless its the most blatant horseshit you’ve scientifically ever seen. So while it absolutely makes sense to say, let’s just train these on good sources, there is no source that is just that. Of course it is still better to do it like that than as they do it now.
Chemistry? Green? Wtf. Green is obviously biology! Chemistry is yellow. There, I said it! Good day to you, sir!
:(
I am actually using this for quite a while but since its not developed anymore I also need to prep for the inevitable. Posted on this actually but only got one good suggestion, web based server side only though, OliveTin.
See my post https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/17822391