It’s not dada. It’s too coherent to be dada, and it’s too shit to be anything else.

In order for something to be an artistic choice, it has to be a choice. It has to have meaning and intent. AI did not choose to put a glass there, it calculated that there was probably a glass there based on shitty reasoning. AI does not have the creative capacity to make art. It can only make images, and those images are shit.

You’ve thoroughly proven you can’t tell between slop and high art, so thank you for the compliment of my critique.

Surrealism is not nonsense. It has a purpose, even if that purpose is hard to tell. If you think Dali and AI slop is the same, you don’t understand either.

AI is like a housefire. Nobody wants it. Nobody needs it. It’s just a bad thing, and if someone sees it, they’re more than justified in being upset and trying to get rid of it. Don’t defend the fire, or you’ll be the first to burn.

Nah, you’ve got it backwards. You don’t pursue that level of money/power/privilege unless you lack humanity. These guys were always shit, but power made them more effective at being shit.

So is toast.

I’ll stop saying it if it stops being true.

False. Porn is sexy, and I can’t possibly be aroused by an image of a woman spreading her cheeks when her fingers are attached to her arse with a continuous piece of flesh, giving her skin the same topography as a teapot.

Funny. Every time someone points out how god awful AI is, someone else comes along to say “It’s just a tool, and it’s good if someone can use it properly.” But nobody who uses it treats it like “just a tool.” They think it’s a workman they can claim the credit for, as if a hammer could replace the carpenter.

Plus, the only people good enough to fix the problems caused by this “tool” don’t need to use it in the first place.

Looks good. Approve

But being on a wall is not a part of the painting. The banana is only art because it’s on a wall. If the art is “banana taped to a wall”, does removing the banana from the wall stop the banana from being art?

The article is from November 2024, so yes, it DID happen months ago.

If he tapes two bananas to the wall at the same time, is that art forgery?

Since the artwork is the banana taped to a wall, does it stop being artwork as soon as it’s taken down? If so, has he actually eaten art, or just destroyed art and eaten a banana?

Can you take two artworks, mash them up, and turn them into artwork bread?

These are just a few of the interesting questions that a crypto-bro just trying to shake his “I’m rich” dick around lacks the intellectual capacity to think about.

Most tools aren’t actively detrimental to use, though. It’s like a hammer where the handle is covered in spikes. Even if you’re a genius and know how to hold it without cutting your hand, most people would just use a different hammer. And I’m not going to let that toolsmith off the hook, either.

I mean, I haven’t, but that’s because I don’t play Warthunder.

“You’re gay because you like men. I’m gay because I hate women.”

I think the term is “pipeweed”

If you and Elon disagree about something, just assume he’s wrong about it. If you both agree on something, THEN you might be mistaken.

It’s actually a very common right-wing idea to take anything publicly owned and turn it into a profit-driven private entity. Chances are, if they don’t own that entity, someone they know does. When the contract goes over budget, you know they’re enjoying the spoils.

Even if it’s owned by nobody they know, at least it’s profit-driven enough to bribe politicians for better contracts.

I will only support putting Donald Trump on Mount Rushmore if you then proceed to push him off.

I know. But he doesn’t use the term as if it describes an actual thing. He uses it to insult people he doesn’t like. He’s more than happy to BE a Nazi, but not be CALLED a Nazi.