Somehow in my head I now see a lot of women with stitched-on, defunct cocks. Welp. Guess they are now augmented.

Don’t forget to claim your warranty for the false google search results.

I was/am. ChatGPT wasn’t. But that’s the joke. It is ironic to post an LLM generated answer to a post explaining that LLM generated answers are stupid.

This is such a bizarre take on AI.

If I ask you a question, I want a useful answer. I don’t care whether you got there by remembering it, Googling it, reading documentation, asking a colleague, or asking an LLM.

Obviously, blindly pasting 2,000 words of irrelevant AI slop is annoying. But that’s a problem with bad answers, not with AI.

The particularly stupid part is suggesting that you should take a perfectly good AI-generated answer and rewrite it in your own words. What exactly has been achieved then? The information is identical, except somebody wasted five minutes manually paraphrasing it so the recipient can feel sufficiently exposed to human keystrokes.

Use AI. Give it the relevant context. Verify important claims. Remove irrelevant garbage. Send the useful answer.

Judge communication by its accuracy, relevance and usefulness—not by how inefficiently somebody produced it.

/s

That just means only idiots install Ubuntu.

Or that it is just the default for WSL.

The number of times I have read “sparks fury” in context of a news related to Trump is just too damn high.

What are you gonna do? Send a formal complaint?

They are chemically different and have different effects. Use “Oxi”.

The amount matters. Sodium percarbonate is much safer to use compared to sodium hypochlorite. And again, the sodium percarbonate does much more than just bleaching.

Bleach is not the name of a chemical, but a group of chemicals with a specific property. In this case, the oxidizer (usually hydrogen peroxide or sodium percarbonate) is also acting as bleach. The same goes for chlorine.

Don’t use clorine in a washing mashine. It will disinfect the machine, but it does not react the same way as hydrogen peroxide or sodium percarbonate. Additionally, chlorine might attack synthetic materials that are needed for the machine to work.

If you have a dish washer, put one of those tabs inside the washing mashine directly, then run it on max heat, full cycle. If you don’t have that, buy something with “Oxi” in the name. There should be a few cheap brands.

What an interesting project! Unfortunately I need MCP support, which is why I now host my own GitLab instance to get rid of GitHub.

If the water is not able to pump off, you wouldn’t be able to open the door. So water flows, meaning the pump is able to work. Don’t worry about the big objects, the pump itself is protected. Odor comes mostly from bacteria, which is killed by heat. Dead bacteria still smells, which is why you use a oxidizer or tensides to get rid of those.

The oxidizer is quite impressive at decomposing anything organic, including hair. So just go ahead and try it.

Ignore them. Anything that does not get dissolved will most likely not be an issue for your laundry.

Finally I can say: “I purposefully do not install the Epic store” instead of “Unfortunately, I can’t install Epic store”

Heat + oxidizer will clean the washing mashine. Let it run on max heat and put some oxidizing powder in there. Empty, obviously.

Afterwards, your machine is basically sterile and the odors should be gone.

Surveillance was never the issue. Crime rate is high because people have no education, no jobs with fair salary, no future. Especially if you have a health condition, chances are that your life will be better inside a prison because of the included healthcare.

Fucked up situation. And it will take decades of recovery.

I’d even go a step further and say that only because of Flock’s good auditing, those cases were revealed. Which means at the same time, that in the past, police officers were doing the same, just hidden.

Kinda like a “don’t shoot the messenger” situation.

Absolutely! We all basically do fingerprinting. We’re just not really conscious about the key we are using. But with a bit of statistics, you could identify people.

• Only the key-holder can check. Your teacher, editor, or favourite “AI detector” website cannot run this test; a genuine check needs the provider’s secret key, or a checking service the provider runs. Google runs an early-access detector portal for SynthID; Anthropic says detection tooling is forthcoming.

I am not so sure about that. The amounts of words is finite and with enough text, you will see that certain words are used more often, especially in certain combinations. I believe people will brute force this and then create a way to destroy the watermark again.

What? Lol

What a smart economist that is. 2 years after everybody knew how this scheme works, they came to the same conclusion. Amazing. Now the world will for sure change. Thank you.