Original link:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/09/06/pentagon-refused-payout-soldiers-died-in-iran-war/

Original link:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/08/28/us-uk-boost-defence-spending-lose-falklands-support/

Archive:

https://archive.is/iAtj8

OP you should swap out the link or your post might get deleted. News aggregators aren’t allowed in this community (Rule 1).

There’s nothing about Ubuntu’s proposed use of AI that seems bad at all. Using it to improve accessibility is a good thing, especially when it’s open source, local-only, and sandboxed. I can’t see how having high quality speech-to-text would be a bad decision. Much of that stuff is probably not even considered “AI” by most people.

It’s completely different from a trial jury though. They usually only meet once or twice a week. Sometimes a couple times a month.

Those are all examples of Facebook failing to moderate, not creating content.

Not half bad, as an idea. I’d only question my credibility as a feature reporter.

I’m pretty busy at the moment but I’ll follow up with you when I get a moment a bit later this week. Cheers!

Kohlrabislaw with apple is really good!

Oh! I didn’t realize that you maintain the wiki. Thanks! Everything moves so fast, I imagine it must be a ton of work to keep it up to date. It would be nice if there was a more streamlined process that made it a bit easier for you.

I was recently checking the table to see what features photon supported. Then I saw the dev say elsewhere that all API features are already supported. You have to look high and low right now. I’m sure it’ll stabilize enough in the near future that it’ll be less of a headache to maintain.

Then so much of the article that the difference between that and the entire article is trivial. Same solution though.

You’re posting good articles from good sources. The mods aren’t looking for excuses to remove them. But the admins also shouldn’t have to take on legal exposure they aren’t comfortable with without consent.

No prob! I’d take @rimu@piefed.social 's Blorp recommendation over mine though. He’d know best.

Your post just can’t be copyright infringement. You were posting the entire article. Just post a couple of paragraphs. It ain’t that hard - just look at other posts in any of the news communities. If you make an effort at fair use, no one is going to delete your post. Just do 3 paragraphs or less if you’re really worried about it. Easy.

https://piefed.social/community/fediverse/wiki/piefed-app

Interstellar looks to be the closest to feature parity with the default web-ui. Some of that is pretty out of date though…

No.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/raw-story/

Sure, I should’ve stuck to a strict definition of the poorly defined thing that you “suppose” means something that wasn’t at all indicated in the comment. Makes sense.

The comment made two claims:

1. We are outraged about this
2. We are not outraged about the targeting of the left

I said:

1. We can be outraged about more than one thing.
2. What evidence do you have to support your second claim?

Using “we” or “no one” is immaterial in that sentence in this context. It’s not more than just not repeating the same words again and again for readability. No sensible person took that to be an ask for evidence that literally not one single person was outraged. The crux of the question, as written above, is “What evidence supports your claim?” Using your assumed definition, I’d have the same question about both claims instead of just one. My main point that we can be outraged about more than one thing would be unchanged.

Why are you acting like an apologist for normalizing the increasing psychopathy of the American society?

I’m not. You’re just failing to think clearly.

I have no idea what they’re individually doing or not doing.

But in the interest of national unity, I’ll join you in the most Canadian of pastimes: talking shit about Americans.

Fuck you, you American bastards! Fix your dumb country, you fucking hosers.

You sound tough, Captain Discomfort. What you bench bro?

Also, I’m Canadian. Not particularly interested in being a good American. Or any kind, really.

Who me?

We can be outraged about more than one thing.

What is your basis for saying no one is outraged about this administration targeting leftists? I’ve seen nothing but outrage.

Not really, but if my circumstances were different I would have. I’ve been super busy so I’ve been a very casual user lately. For me, that means mostly using my phone where I use Voyager. I also bounce back and forth between Lemmy and Piefed. I knew something was wrong with Tesseract but I couldn’t figure out what it was. I wrote a comment about it in a deleted thread that I’ll quote here. This is in response to AdmiralPatrick asking rhetorically if they should have been more up front:

As someone who’s used Tesseract for years, it would’ve been nice. You said elsewhere that no one else had complained but I had no idea what was going on. I use Voyager on my phone and I had notifications showing up there that were absent in Tesseract. I had comments I’d made from my phone that I couldn’t see from my browser. And, like, comments about the World Cup. Does Tesseract hate football? Sports in general? I had no idea that there was a new semi-secret blocklist and that someone else in that comment chain had committed some unknown-to-me sin elsewhere so I couldn’t continue that discussion with others from my laptop. I ended up keeping a second Lemmy-UI tab open because, as much as I love it, I couldn’t trust Tesseract until this mysterious problem was resolved. Not a great experience.

I switched to Photon so… a little, I guess?