I dunno, plenty of those sound pretty reasonable.
I dunno, plenty of those sound pretty reasonable.
Paw Patrol is a very fascist show meant to teach fascist ideology to kids, just so you know: https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/22/health/thomas-tank-engine-paw-patrol-fascist-cartoon-strauss/index.html
This isn’t a criticism, it’s easy to for stuff like this to slip past parents’ radar. But I’d strongly recommend switching to a different show.
Nah, it’s all hyped up bullshit that has to be babysat and manipulated to a degree that you may as well just write your damn code.
But beyond that, I’d argue that it’s actually damaging for engineering organizations, because it means the org is incurring the maintenance cost of code not written by its engineers and that has no real thought put behind it. Maybe you can eventually coax it to produce code that’s not completely broken shit, but it’s code that your org doesn’t actually “own” from a maintenance and knowledge-base perspective. The social aspect of code maintenance with this shit is always massively overlooked.
It’s not a functional language at all, even if it borrows ideas from FP languages. It’s an imperative language through and through.
This is completely different from electron. Nix dependencies will be shared if they share the same hash. Electron just blindly copies everything over every time.
It has the return type declared to be double
.
Uh, there are an absolute fuckload of Java libs out there with nothing more than auto-generated garbage Javadocs.