Piss.

It depends on what you consider worse. Deepseek will outright refuse to answer a question, but other models will happily answer with poisoned data.

See for example, grok translations of neutral questions about israel completely changing the questions: https://www.instagram.com/p/DXpK0BvFOUn/

and israel investing in influencing the output of chatgpt: https://www.ynetnews.com/tech-and-digital/article/rj00kxqzaxx

Both are forms of censorship and both are bad, but personally I’d rather an AI shut up than slip in misinformation. If someone is going to take AI at its word (which people shouldn’t do, but you know how people are) then the misinformation will be taken as truth, but a message saying “I can’t discuss such things” will make someone turn elsewhere for answers.

Now ask western models about israel.

The convenience isn’t worth the downside. It’s just a gaping security hole and data sink for corporations to suck from. Eventually the company will stop supporting the product and you’re stuck having to use an outdated app and maintain your own copy (if that’s allowed). You can roll your own system, but then all that work is placed on you, and for what kind of convenience? To remotely control devices or sync states to provide a minor convenience when it works and a major headache when it does not?

Yay cats!

These politicians are either gigantic morons or malicious pieces of shit. Probably both.

I’m doing my part!

The robot with the legs that can be extended or packed into compartments (shown at 2:34 in the video) is really cool!

I look forward to when CXMT scales up and provides cheap memory. The memory cartel will cry about unfair competition, just like when Japan was kicking ass with memory in the 80s.

Chatgpt came out in late 2022. Are you arguing that because the AI bubble didn’t pop yet that it’s not a bubble? The internet persisted but that doesn’t mean the dot-com boom wasn’t a bubble.

Piracy is a matter of survival.

Only wearing shorts?! Shameful!

Then why did you respond to my comment? Trump supporters are liars, trolls, and hypocrites, we totally agree on that. My comment didn’t say anything contrary to that.

Your only point is that democrats aren’t at fault. That you think people protesting the genocide of Palestinians is a “manufactured problem” speaks volumes. Biden was bypassing congress to supply weapons for that genocide, but you somehow still think it’s not the fault of democrats or that it’s not a problem at all.

Democrats are great at blaming everything but themselves for losing. I remember people like you on here claiming that the protests about the genocide in Palestine stopped once Trump won but that’s plain bullshit, and there were protests against the genocide in Palestine specifically calling out Trump in my city even after the election.

Now you’re trying to paint me as a Trump supporter for pointing out that discussions about elections tend to reduce outside of elections. What happened to the “rational liberal” that democrats pride themselves on being? Don’t you have some lesser evil acts to carry out? Maybe some people to tie to train tracks?

Next time democrats should try pushing for policies that people want instead of relying on “vote blue no matter who” which clearly didn’t work, even though I voted for Harris. Guess I didn’t vote hard enough, huh?

It’s not surprising that talk about the election was greatly reduced after the election ended.

I think you’re assuming a non-human fantasy dwarf here.

CPU manufacturers were getting jealous at the other hardware manufacturers claiming shortages in this artificial scarcity scenario.

Biden could’ve slammed the brakes on Trump by appointing an AG who would’ve pursued prosecution and put Trump behind bars for his many crimes. Instead he appointed Merrick Garland, who was as useless as himself. Such is standard operating procedure of the democratic party: let bad guys go so you can have someone worse to run against instead of actually making things better.

They are a stock buyer and holder, so they take part in that pricing. If inflated valuations became a detriment, the stocks would be priced accordingly. We shouldn’t desire unrealistic p/e ratios.