You tout science, but you’ve cited an NPR interview where the conclusion you call “most likely” is described by issuing agencies as “low confidence.” That doesn’t make it seem “most likely” at all. What is most likely is that we don’t have enough information to draw a definitive conclusion, so being judgemental about it might be hasty and hypocritical. The NPR interview also states that we don’t know where the intelligence is coming from, so criticizing China for not being transparent but ignoring the secrecy of the intelligence agencies is a double standard.
The other source is a video from Ken LaCorte, who is a former Fox News executive who killed a legitimate Trump and Stormy Daniels story that turned out to be true, so his credibility is questionable on top of the fact he ran competing US political partisan websites and hired Macedonian teenagers to write the content to stir up contention.
You claim to never trust the media, but you’re trusting a known manipulative media executive.
A better question is why the origin story matters so much to you. Does it change the need for masking or quarantines or vaccines in your opinion? If China came out and said it was a lab leak, how would it affect your life in a fundamental way?
People get banned on social media for legitimate and illegitimate reasons every day. This is a weird hill to die on.
Yeah, this seems like terrible advice.
Just because DNA currently doesn’t say much about you that can theoretically be used against you, that doesn’t stop bad actors from using it as a pretense. Don’t imagine what an honest person will do with it. Imagine what a dishonest person might try to do with it. Act accordingly.
And what’s the opposite side? Where’s the benefit of letting them keep it? You can always get your DNA tested again later if they actually come out with a useful application of the information.