Hildegarde

I don’t think this was illegal under US law. Congress gave the president the power to unilaterally deploy the military pretty much anywhere during george bush’s war in Iraq. Congress has to review the deployment afterwards and can stop it from continuing. Congress gave bush, and every subsequent president the power to do exactly what happened.

The US doesn’t do formal declarations of war anymore. WWII was the last time that happened. Congress authorized military operations without formal declarations many times since. Presidents to this day have been continuing to use the 2001 antiterrorism authorization to strike wherever they want. Obama and Biden did it too, they just didn’t do anything as brazen as kidnapping a president.

The military planned the strikes. You can’t kidnap a head of state in a single evening without a laying a lot of groundwork. The US has a history of backing coups in South America, and they’ve been building a case for war against Venezuela for over a decade. This was within standard practice for the US military.

This, and most of trumps other actions should be illegal. But those who made and enforced the laws since the start of the millennium have all been collaborators.

You probably mean the PineNote, the 10 inch eink tablet. Pinetab is a normal tablet with a lcd screen.

…

did you read what I wrote?

I was in a jury recently, and they were clear in the instructions that we were to make decisions on the basis of the law as it is, not one what we think it should be. Some of the questions during jury selected were specifically tailored to identifying those who might consider nullification.

Juries still exist in civil cases. They are there to make findings of fact, just like a criminal case. Bench trials are those without a material dispute of the facts.

Nullification is a side effect, a consequence of the process. Nullification is not the primary reason for a jury.

Juries exist to determine facts, and check the work of the prosecutor to make sure they proved the case to the standards required by law. They are an essential part of the legal process, and the possibility of nullification is an interesting byproduct.

This case was not nullification. He was charged with theft for towing a car, which is not theft anywhere, and is standard practice for tow truck operators. The vehicle was returned less than 20 minutes later.

Not guilty was a reasonable conclusion, not a case of a jury nullifying an otherwise solid case.

Capitalism is the best system to live in when the owning class has a genuine fear of a communist revolution.

How will democrats react when a democrat democrats?

no u

ur trans now not sorry

im had

A multiple choice question where all the answers are wrong, says nothing about math or the mathematical understanding of the general population.

This is engagementbait and its hooked you too.

Imagine a rollover incident in the top one.

You do not understand the concept of time.

Go back to school. You clearly need more of it.

I delivered on the part that is relevant to the article that we are commenting on.

You can learn to research things yourself. Ask a librarian if you need help. You can do it!

evidently not

Ok, pay my consultancy fee and I’ll get you a report in a week.

This article is discussing the socialist candidates who won elections in November of this year. None of them take office until January.

It is currently December. None of them are in office yet. They cannot deliver anything from the office until they are in the office.

Its weird you keep asking.

patience child

Samuel Tunick, is described as a local Atlanta activist

not a visitor

Yes