Haha fair enough. Although I didn’t mean that specifically, just weird sexual content in general.

What else would it mean? That’s the kind of content the internet creates.

You’re confusing a want with a need. Resistance doesn’t come without risk. The longer we wait the more we have to risk. Many are already going hungry and more will join them November 1st. If you wait for them to be fed before striking you’ll never start.

To do what, wear out one section of carpet faster than the rest of your house?

I hope they get to read this:

Suck my dick ICE. Get a real job you masked losers.

How are you going to fix those systemic issues without getting people to see through the propaganda?

Why do you think that’s not universal?

People don’t get a pass because they’re targeted by propaganda. Everyone is targeted by propaganda. It’s your job as an individual to see it for what it is and adjust your perspective accordingly. Failing to do so is not anyone else’s fault.

I don’t know that the threshold is the problem. I think the problem is that about 35% of humans are complete pieces of shit. I don’t know how you account for that effectively. Expecting the rest of society to counter them seems about as reasonable of a solution as you’re likely to find and that’s essentially what we have now.

Fucking. He says fucking.

The system wasn’t supposed to be perfect or eternal. The founders explicitly said that they expected each successive generation to essentially rewrite the constitution. It’s not their fault that we only made minor tweaks over 250 years.

Harris and Clinton have a lot in common and I don’t think the fact that they both have vaginas is the most prominent shared reason that they lost their respective elections. I have no doubt that there is a subset of voters who would never vote for a woman but I’m pretty confident most of them are Trump voters anyway.

If a progressive woman similar to AOC loses then I’ll concede the point. Until then I believe it’s mostly the unpopular status quo platform causing the problem.

We only have the one so, yeah, obviously.

Besides, what does it even mean to have “another” internet? Even if you could build something entirely separate, all it takes is one person bridging the two and now you’re back to having one large network. You could use different protocols to transmit data but then you’re using the same underlying infrastructure which makes the concept of separation more philosophical than physical.

Personally I found the crown on his head and the fighter jet labeled “King Trump” more objectionable. I’m pretty used to dealing with his shit by now.

It’s not an illogical position to take it’s just naive. In the same way that military service members are supposed to disregard illegal orders, Congress is supposed to impeach a President who breaks the law or established codes of conduct.

It sounds good in theory but both ultimately rely on the integrity of the people in those positions. If they don’t rise to the challenge then there isn’t anything stopping the bad actors from doing what they want with impunity. We can hope it will be enough but it hasn’t changed much so far. It seems like the people who could act know this and are colluding with the executive branch to test how far they can push things before we decide to go looking outside the system for solutions. I see no reason to believe that the military will respond any differently than Congress has.

What exactly would you describe as appealing about Trump?

I bet you would have said the same thing about Trump in 2016 and yet here we are. Attempting to understand the thought process of inherently irrational people is a losing battle.

Yeah 80 year old men only pretend to be senile because of all the pussy it gets them

You don’t have to use the word tragedy to be a good person

If that bothers you then gun shops are still open. There’s nothing stopping you from doing what it seems like you want somebody else to do for you.