People just want to ignore we saved the DNC, because billionaire owned talking heads on their TVs haven’t said it.
I get what you’re trying to say but I think it’s totally reasonable for people to expect more proof that this is true than “the new DNC chair has said some nice things”, especially considering the fact that Schumer and Jefferies are still out there doing the same old bullshit
I am admittedly not familiar with most of his work directly, but I had no idea that Shel Silverstein was a man
You’re talking about substituting an adversarial government with a stable replacement. Trump and Hegseth are talking about bombing the shit out of Iran. There is no strategy required to achieve their goals. They’re already accomplishing them.
There are Republicans in Congress from every state (I didn’t fact check this statement but either way the sentiment holds). Montana is not the problem. We are.
You mean the shitty games? Oh no…
Damn, I guess he can’t play the same game that’s been rereleased annually for 20 years then huh. What a bummer
The fact that people don’t like Skyler is intentional. At some point you’re supposed to ask “why am I cheering for the drug dealer over this woman”? That disconnect is a huge part of why the story is so engaging. They make you root for the bad guy over the good guys, even when you shouldn’t.
Many of those questions aren’t particularly useful either. They may be interesting from a philosophical perspective but that’s the language of thinking, not the language of doing. I’ve written code in assembly language. I’ve looked at the output in binary. I can explain in basic terms what is happening there. Does that help anybody?
I would argue that it doesn’t because almost everyone writes code in higher level languages. Even if I can tell you what I know it doesn’t provide any practical information for you to use. Similarly, I could explain to you how long division works but the next time you need to divide two numbers you’re still going to reach for a calculator instead of a pencil and paper. What then is the point of lamenting the loss of knowledge that no one uses directly? It could be reconstructed from what remains if necessary but since it isn’t necessary it doesn’t matter.
God damn, those are some real life goblins
Seems like we could all just mellow out a bit. You shouldn’t need to be afraid of saying stuff that isn’t perfectly pc now or in the past. Obviously there’s a difference between an off color joke and shit you would find in the Epstein files but I’m not particularly concerned about anything I’ve posted coming back to me. I’ve had bad takes (I’m sure I still do) and said things in the past that I no longer agree with, but who cares? That’s what life is like. You change over time in more ways than one. If someone wants to judge me harshly for that then we probably don’t weren’t going to hang out anyway so fuck em. Let them react how they want.
That being said, the implications of this kind of technology being used by corporations or the government are quite different. There may be value in what you’re saying from that perspective.
Whoever wrote that prompt seems to think that other nations having their own ideologies is the worst thing possible. That’s a common attitude regarding geopolitics that I’ve never really understood, especially from a Western perspective where differences in opinion are supposed to be seen as valuable (at least in the theoretical sense).
Amazon isn’t the cheapest option in many cases. What you’re saying makes sense if people shop around, the problem is that they generally don’t.
A serious discussion about the ethics of bestiality? If that’s the kind of place you’re looking for I think you might have to create it yourself.
Oh no please don’t block me
I didn’t say it would change anything. I said his morals are as useful as his report, meaning not at all. It’s a good thing Smith, Biden, and Garland took their time though huh. We wouldn’t want to set the precedent of impropriety.
I love living in a fascist hell hole so long as the people who could have stopped it feel like they kept their morals intact. If they lost that too I think it would be too much for me to bear.
Haha do what works for you. I was able to get into them after a long car trip where I forced myself to listen to an audiobook. After finishing it it got easier and easier the more I did it. Now I barely read physical books.
Interesting, than you for sharing. It sounds like your use case is indeed very different from mine. Do what works for you
lol OK. Share some examples if that’s what you want to do. I’m not sure why it’s my job to prod you to say what you want to say.