That’s true. Most abusers don’t have millions of people who make excuses for their shitty behavior.
The funny thing is, if I happened to have made this comparison in reference to the US, Russia, China, or Israel I bet you would be reacting pretty differently right now.
I don’t know enough about the situation to have a real opinion on the matter. All I’m saying is that what I’m hearing as the justification for Denmark keeping control of Greenland sounds just like the logic that many kinds of abusers use to justify their controlling behavior. It’s theoretically possible that it’s 100% true in this case but my previous experience with that kind of language says that is unlikely.
“She can leave anytime she wants but she knows what will happen if she does”
Real abusive husband vibes there. Obviously the US should not attempt to take over any part of Greenland but the argument you’re making sounds more like a hostage situation than anything else.
Kids can pee a lot and there’s only so much liquid you can absorb with a reasonable amount of material. Seems like a valid use of that phrase to me
Wasn’t broccoli-top enough
It’s only irrelevant if you’re intentionally ignoring facts which disagree with your conclusion
Obama certainly acted like a centrist but that’s not how he campaigned which means that’s not what won him the election.
The last time there was another option on the table he became the first black president in our nation’s history. Perhaps there’s a lesson to be learned there.
That’s what they said about far left black men until Obama came along running as a progressive and won handily. For some reason we didn’t learn any lessons from that and went right back to boring centrist candidates afterwards.
We’ve proven we don’t like centrist women with status quo platforms pretty convincingly. Anything more is speculative imo.
To be clear, I dont wish violence on anyone
You don’t have to say this to be a decent person. Pacifism is not synonymous with good or moral. There are people in this world that I think you would be immoral to not wish violence upon.
Those last 5 words are the real catch though, aren’t they?
It’s OK. Stoned jokes are hit or miss and sobriety says this one was a miss
I’m aware. I think you guys misread what I said though
That’s awfully antisemenetic of you
That’s a nice sentiment and I do hope it’s true, but I don’t think I am capable of believing it’s possible for people to change their political opinions outside of early adulthood in a meaningful way anymore. I’ve seen too many people do insane things to avoid any kind of introspection.
What does lower top 10% mean?
People don’t click on articles with headlines like “Idiotic People Still Doing Nonsensical Things”
What if you’re on Family Feud and the category is “things not to do when you meet your new girlfriend’s family”?