• 1 Post
  • 610 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 20th, 2025

help-circle
  • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.comtomemes@lemmy.worldMixtapes 2.0
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Also making a comeback because of things like Elsagate and YouTube Kids’ weird algorithms. Parents need to have reliable kid-friendly media that they can put on, without constantly needing to monitor it… And a DVD box set of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood won’t end up showing your kid softcore fetish content disguised as children’s videos, as soon as you walk away from the screen to make dinner.

    I run a small Plex/Jellyfin server, and have a library specifically for kids’ shows. And my users can lock their kids’ accounts down so they can only access that library. So my various friends and relatives can put something on via Plex, and trust that it will stay safe for their kids.


  • Yes and no… Women do complain about a lack of pockets, while simultaneously buying pants that physically don’t have room for pockets.

    But on the other side of the same coin, women’s heavy duty cargo pants have smaller interior pockets too. Like the exterior pouch pockets may be the same/equivalent size, but the main front and back pockets are often still tiny. There’s no real way to rationalize that or blame women for it, because that’s the entire point of the pants, and there is 100% enough room for larger pockets in those baggier pants.

    And no, they often can’t just buy men’s pants, because the cut is very different. Guys tend to have narrower hips and wider waists. Women wearing men’s pants will tend to have the waistband fit (but can’t get their hips into them) or be able to get their hips into the pants (but then need to cinch down the waist by a ridiculous and uncomfortable amount). Women’s pants tend to have more hip room and narrow waistbands, to account for that.



  • It’s paid using existing debt collection channels, which means the private insurance is only making pennies on the dollar, and it’s money they would have already made anyways.

    Let’s say an insurance company has $1M in outstanding debt to collect. They don’t want to bother with actually collecting, because they know the chance of actually collecting any individual debt is low. They’re willing to write off a lot of it as a loss, but they want to get some money for it. So they sell it to a debt collector.

    The insurance company takes that $1M in aggregated debt, (owed by dozens or even hundreds of people), and a debt collector buys it for like $50k. The debt collector gets the debtors’ contact info, and how much they owe. Oftentimes, that’s basically all they get.

    Now the debt collector can work on actually collecting that debt. They know that collecting on any one person’s debt will be difficult, but anything past that initial $50k investment is pure profit for them. And there is a lot of potential profit to be made on that $950k. They’ll be able to do things like offer steep discounts to debtors, because even 50% of the debt is still $450k in profit. They’ll work on that aggregated debt for a while, and the ones that they can’t collect on will get re-aggregated and resold to another debt collector for even less.

    The government basically went “well companies are already selling the debt… Why don’t we just buy it and forgive it? It’ll be cheaper than paying their debts outright or fighting with the hospitals to lower bills, and it doesn’t require getting voters onboard with socialized healthcare.” If they’re able to spend $50k to forgive $1M in debt, that’s a huge win even if it means $50k lands in the insurance company’s pocket. And again, that money would have eventually made its way to the insurance company anyways, via normal debt collectors buying the debt.


  • FWIW, simply living with an adblocker for a while will inoculate you to a lot of the most predatory BS. My wife had a similar experience. At first she was annoyed by the dual pi-holes I set up, because they broke her sponsored Google search links. Then she learned to skip those first few links and got used to having ads blocked. We recently moved, and I hadn’t had time to set them back up. I have simply been using the new ISP’s modem/router.

    Last week, she basically begged me to find some time to set the network stuff back up, because she hated seeing ads now. She got used to the pi-holes, and then they were suddenly gone. She was like “yeah a lot of my favorite sites are basically unusable now. I don’t know how the hell I ever functioned before you set those things up…” What sent her over the edge was when she noticed an ad on our TV’s sleep screen. Not even in the show we were watching. Just on the sleep screen, because the show had been paused for like 15-20 minutes. That one ad was the straw that broke the camel’s back, because even when the device was idle it was still trying to show her ads.



  • You caught downvotes for what seemed to be a genuine question. No, it’s not technically illegal. It’s a weird loophole that exists because of the way the laws are written. The jurors cannot be prosecuted for passing the “wrong” sentence, so it is not illegal.

    Sitting on a jury while intending to nullify could be illegal, because it would require perjury; They make jurors swear under oath to uphold the law, and ask if there is anything that would prevent them from doing so. If you intend to nullify and answer “no”, it is technically a lie under oath. But they can’t prove that you intended to nullify when you were answering, so prosecuting jurors for it would be a fool’s errand.










  • In the US, wage theft is larger than every other form of theft combined. It’s literally over 51% of all theft. But it’s typically considered a civil issue, not criminal. So cops won’t help, and individual employees need to sue to get anything. And when those employees are being stolen from, they can’t afford a lawyer to sue.

    And the current administration has systematically defunded, delegitimized, and dismantled organizations like the National Labor Relations Board, the Department of Labor, etc which actually had the teeth to fight for workers.

    When people talk about white collar crime not being prosecuted, this is the kind of shit they’re talking about. You walk into a gas station and blatantly steal a $2 candy bar every day. By the end of the week, they’ll have a cop waiting for you to show up… But that same gas station chain steals $2 from every single employee every single day, by requiring them to show up 15 minutes before their clock-in time, netting them hundreds of thousands of dollars in stolen wages every year? That’s a civil issue, and the employees need to take it up with the gas station’s corporate lawyers… Who will drag a court case out until the employees are all broke and have to drop the case.



  • My wife’s ex… She wanted a dog, he didn’t. They compromised and got a dog. She broke it off shortly afterwards, because she realized he was a full blown mask-off white supremacist. She got the dog in the split, because she was the one who wanted him in the first place.

    We got married like a decade later, and the dog died shortly afterwards. She had him blocked on everything, but sent a “hey just wanted to let you know the dog died” message through a mutual friend who still talked to him. He tried to use “grief processing” as an excuse to meet up for lunch. He was still a blatant white supremacist, but hadn’t seen any of our wedding photos because she had him blocked on everything. I’m not white. I offered to tag along to their meeting, just to see his the look on his face when I walked through the door and introduced myself as her husband.