That would be terrible because they are both some of the best academic publishers in the humanities.
Poplar?
That would be terrible because they are both some of the best academic publishers in the humanities.
Said communities would rather indirectly “house” them in tax-funded prisons? I’d point them to studies on how incarcerating and enforcing these laws end up costing Americans more than it does to house people, such as this: https://homelessvoice.org/the-cost-to-criminalize-homelessness/
What a strange state of affairs. People may not live outdoors because that looks unsightly. But you will also not give them a place to go.
Hope there are enough homeless shelters for them to move into. Otherwise you would be suggesting the inconvenience you face from having to see them sleep in the streets justifies making it impossible for them to in their desperate situation have even that.
So she takes “animal” to mean something like “non-human critters”. Not everyone uses words intending them to fit the technical meanings e.g biologists give.