

Why would she ask that? She works for Bari Weiss and David Ellison. 60 minutes actually cut Trump having tantrum from the interview.


Why would she ask that? She works for Bari Weiss and David Ellison. 60 minutes actually cut Trump having tantrum from the interview.


Gotta have a government-recognized binding contract so your spouse can make legal decisions for you. Call it whatever you want (marriage cert, domestic partner) but it has to be the same for all people under the law.
This is part of what the fight for marriage equality was all about. Spouses were unable to see their partners in the hospital, or get custody of children, or inherit, etc. etc. Some people tried to draw up legal agreements, but they ran into obstacles with other family members taking them to court. Remember, “Separate, but equal is inherently unequal.”


Up next:
Take your pick. This is what happens when government steps outside of contract law, and into endorsement of religious beliefs.


The website you linked to says that it’s not a class action suit, but a “mass arbitration” which I’ve never heard of. It also claims that Google has a “no class action” clause in its warranty/user agreement. I don’t see how that’s legal, but whatever. I also wonder if that clause was there at the time of purchase for gen 1 and gen 2 thermostats.


While an interesting idea, that project wants what amounts to the cost of a new thermostat in exchange for a kickstarter project. Might as well just buy a new thermostat.


Please find another news source besides CBS News.


Surprisingly, these still work as dumb thermostats after the cutoff date.


Was hoping something like Homebridge could be used to still control these, but so far no luck. After the cutoff they can be used manually like a traditional thermostat, which is a surprise coming from Google. I still fear they are going to generate a bunch of ewaste from people replacing them.


Isn’t this how Skynet started?


You need to start looking for sources other than CBS News. It’s being run by someone who should be working for Fox.


I think it’s more likely just Tim Cook. The buck stops with him. Someone needs to say no to some of this stuff (liquid glass, yearly release schedules, etc.) and that someone should have been him.


They did. Someone at the top has been ruining that experience lately.


But he is a wimp. 🤷♂️


Actually amazed it isn’t running windows.


“It remains unclear which roles were affected by the layoffs.”
I’m not a fan of AI or layoffs, but this whole article is just speculation.


At least they still work. Yay for manual/offline mode.


She’s a brilliant person, but the US has repeatedly shown it’s still too misogynistic to elect a woman president.
So does this mean she wants the VP slot under Vance? Or is this some sort of fundraising grift?