Counting cohomology has done to me a numbers x_x

Honestly I have trouble dealing with the fact that others (like you) are very eloquent, while I am just a babbling buffoon. It is difficult

True nathematician would never make a mistake distinguishing finite and infinite cardinality. Countability, on the other hand… (but that’s a separate issue)

I see. Maybe learning mathematics have screwed my writing since so much of mathematical literature is simply equations, definitions and propositions. Lots of papers, and even books, are just bad at expositions, in my experience.

It takes hours to write essays for me…

I wish I were you, I struggle so much with reading books and papers

They do have antiderivatives, you just cannot elementarily compute them. Non-exact differential forms, however…

Seems like one can maybe work with complex metric. Interesting idea

I am sorry, but… to be pedantic, pythagorean theorem works on real-valued length. Complex numbers can be scalars, but one does not use it for length for some reason I forgor.

What is Harambe rep? I only know it is apparently “starting point of things going wrong”

Same, I especially hate dreams of having friends, it saddens me

I thought this was taught in high school. Curriculums differ drastically between countries, don’t they?

The haskell examples look more like an arcane wizardry.

So I missed out on US nuclear stock? Damn

I mean the combinatorics and the imagery is nice.

Do you live in where I live, that sounds exactly like my country

Topology on steroids with K-valued logic, nice

I’d say still risky. They might perpetuate the bubble for longer, which means high risk of forced covering at loss.

I am not familiar with this, would you share what country you are talking about?

May I ask for an interesting archeological piece/story?