What? I don’t know.

Depends how dirty you accept the power.

Damn Samsung, they ruined Samsung!

Birdseed.

(Bird.)

See? You are trying to divert the discussion about the article to anything but the article. You really want to get this off topic to anything else you can because the facts work against you.

This is literally about the article. How you think the article and a thread about the article and all the comments about the article is in fact not about the article is beyond me. You simply don’t want to acknowledge the article and the discussion about the article or the facts of the article or the positions of the article because it works against you. So you ignore the article and the facts of the article and the comments of the article and try to divert the discussion of the article to anything but the article.

And again: I am informing protest-non-voters what they voted for. You know, Trump overturning fuel efficiency because that s what the article and the entire thread is about.

And now we have the very bizarre “You want to discuss the article, which works against me, in a discussion forum about the article? You must be magalite”. It makes no sense.

I mean how else is “Neither party gives a shit about you” supposed to be interpretted?To which I am sending you to the article.

So it played out exactly like I said.

You: Both sides same!

Me: See the article.

You; No! Both sides same!

You: They need to give appealing positions on issues!

Them: Here’s the positions.

You: It’s not about the positions!!

Do you realize the insanity of this? You’ve basically repeated this 3 times now, ducking and weaving every time. Now it’s b b bboth sides same, to which I point you to the article again. Like how is this possible for you to keep saying this.

You: Both sides same!!

Me: Read the article or even the headline to see how that’s not the case.

You: No! Both sides same!

No wonder you won’t acknowledge the positions, the issues being discussed, or the policies literally being overturned.

Lastly, I am informing protest-non-voters what they voted for

While Harris didn’t explicitly say it, it was obvious she would continue on climate issues.

And are you even reading what the article is about? Because it seems like you’re avoiding it. The article is literally about the fuel efficiency standards that Biden put in, and you are dead set on ignoring that. So I guess it bears repeating: Trump repealing Biden’s fuel efficiency standards is what you voted for.

Biden: Puts in fuel efficiency standards.

You: Nope.

I mean there is literally no other way to describe the sitaution.

They’ll just say “some innocents will be inconvenienced.” Remember they don’t understand until they are hurt personally.

This is for the average across the fleet.

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters.

Remember Republicans don’t think a problem exists until it hurts them personally.

Vehicle Tracking System (VTS) — a security module designed to prevent theft but now shutting down cars unexpectedly.

Also, what a strangely written article.

A1 is coming for our jobs. It’s an evil cable of people.

Mining costs are probably subject to more increases, as things get harder to access and environmental laws tighten.

What’s more, the researchers say the method is much more affordable than other battery-based lithium-harvesting techniques, costing about US$12.70 per kilogram of lithium recovered.

Indeed, according to Daily Metal Prices, lithium costs $13.17 per kilo on the open market as of the time of writing. So this method actually comes out cheaper than just buying the stuff.

I’m not getting left handed vs right handed. Right handed means negative values go right? Why would anyone do that?

Condensed steam.