

But then someone will have to deal with it somewhere, better just unwrap it under the carpet.
Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend time with friends.
You can reach me on mastodon @sukhmel@mastodon.online or telegram @sukhmel@tg
But then someone will have to deal with it somewhere, better just unwrap it under the carpet.
it’s clear at this point already that Zig is a weakly-typed language
Uhm… pretty sure it isn’t.
They seem to think any type inference makes for a weak typing, judging by their previous rant about auto
in C++
So, yeah, author’s views are a bit special, not sure this article will help me be better :(
Albeit true, I want to note that some languages encourage such practices way more than others do. Also, when you’ve got a hammer everything looks like a string nail.
By printing memes on it?
Vibe coding is when you’re not coding, just typing prompts into AI in hopes it will produce a legible code.
Source I found from a link on Stack overflow
Also, the could be better if it had alt text
I find this statement to be a bit contradictory to your point of ‘there is no “best” solution’
I don’t think vibe-coding is particularly good thing, but I find it completely normal for someone to just want to vibe something up and not want to understand. It’s not always a useful approach, but sometimes it might be a ‘best’ strategy, too
If that’s a joke, it’s a good one. Otherwise, well, there are a lot of “this letter isn’t needed let’s throw it away,” in most cases it will not work as good as you think.
This quote from Linus is what I find inspiring hope of a future wider adoption or Rust:
Thanks. I decided to try to do the merge on my own, but failed. I came close, but it was good to have your example merge to see what I got wrong.
The pin_init becoming a crate of its own, but ‘pin::Pin’ being in the core crate ended up messing with my “monkey see, monkey do” approach to Rust merges.
I’ll learn eventually, in the meantime please do continue to give me example merges and I’ll use them as training wheels.
Not everything that’s poorly written is ai, you should give humans more credit
We have an engineering manager that’s about the same, the only issue is that they let PR through because features are wanted and there’s no time to get things right.
I think, I may be pleased to have to redo everything several times to make it better and simpler, but what we get is that everything is bad but we’ll still merge 😞
I now feel at several times I fucked up quite a lot by making something that works but not something simpler.
My girlfriend is gonna be mighty upset is she thinks I’m into that kinda thing. […] please change the image to something Gnome-related and/or trustworthy.
That’s an interesting takeaway from a DDoS issue
It’s a step in between
It then takes it a step further, as they are both 0 in that regard
I’d say that trying to get Rust everywhere is just something that is done in the hope it will help the ecosystem mature faster. It’s a bit hard to compete with languages that are 30, 40, or over 50 years old
TBF, your previous post reads to me the opposite way, like ‘it is not enough of a hate site’. Also I would offer you to look at it as a Venn diagram, if something is a hate site and more, it is still a hate site, just with extra
Yeah, that sounds like a crappy way to promote the product
What’s the use for those in corporate env, that’s not available outside of it?
One can be pro- or anti- any concept or thing, some options just make more sense
Maintainers, I guess, as in, the update that was rolled out, was broken for some users. But I don’t know if that’s the case here