lad

Maybe that was a joke 🤔

This, but the first line should’ve fallen way down somewhere in the middle

I can try to summarise my view like this: I believe, that in practice most of critical system repair locks are scam because everyone just hopes that shit will hold long enough; I was writing about why it could be reasonable if it was actually done with proper care by licensed people, and why repairs done by an unlicensed technician could be dangerous

Only if it’s a special transport, i.e. an ambulance, a fire truck, or such

My sound is on, but I hear nothing ¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯

I think, legally forbidden fixing could make sense for things that people’s life depends on, like health devices, or amusement park installations, or aviation. On the other hand, I don’t know if that is applied reasonably in reality (likely not)

Edit: I mean, even in that case the repairs are allowed, but only for a qualified party

Well, I mean, I can’t make sense of what you wrote

You mean, I wouldn’t care about them if I saw them up close, too?

I can see better if I sit higher

The picture is horrible, but the idea (maybe) was like this?

  3 5
3 5
_____
3 8 5

Yes, like living together, sometimes even with kids, I don’t think that’s dating, but I’m so 1984 in that, yeah

I mean it more in the way it depends on what you qualify as dating, I would even say that not every pair of people who are not married yet but are dating can be called dating

I guess, it depends

I guessed it right, but was afraid for a bit. They changed the title to be more specific now, was a hurry not a clickbait

Only when viewed by Adobe Acrobat

So it was trimmed originally, after all

Also, avoid Cachy or other Arch based distros for now. They are great, but a far more hands-on. Something for the future, when you are more comfortable with linux in general.

Yeah, I recently switched from Mint to EndeavourOS which is Arch, and it breaks way more often. But I must admit, it’s more stable than Debian was 15 years ago, so I assume that Linux is getting friendlier in general

Available on Unix only.

Only kills the thread if it has enabled cancellation

I mean, they will probably set it up correctly to be able to use it

In this way, we can avoid relying on subprocesses and instead use threads (or, technically, asynchronous tasks) in Rust. Threads/tasks are much easier to manage

I believe, in their case cancelling a sync operation will not be a problem because they will not forever block on executing user-provided code, but cancelling a synchronous thread is not easy, afaik

Treat a + b/c + d as a + b/(c + d) I can almost understand, I was guilty of doing that in school with multiplication, but auto-parenthesising the first part is really crazy take, imo