lad

I’m not sure that not having anyone on salary is part of that deal. Or if you were referring to the part where I said about salary being negative, that’s from experience, a couple of directors of a non-profit I know had to donate their salary and add on top of it when times were rough (in that organisation it was pretty often). Large non-profits probably don’t have that issue

But for fun both bridge out of cardboard and packaging out of concrete might work, tastes differ ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)_⁠/⁠¯

Now I wonder, because both 999k and 100k are six figure sums, and one of them I find much more reasonable than the other.

But yeah, running a non-profit often takes money instead of earning you money, and if they have spare money to pay salary to the CEO, maybe they’re all right

What were specific compatibility patches for the kernel, I guess, but I am also not sure

You have to knit them yourself

Friend is a bit different from the original take of not interacting with anyone in the community

The industrial software library development should be done by professional software engineering companies in a socially responsible way.

That would maybe be nice in theory, except nobody wants to pay, so this would be both terrible and limiting in practice

You may screenshot the desktop after login and use it as a background, but I don’t think it will be exactly the same

Who is the third one?

This sounds dope, does this mean that Frame is what was assumed to be a next Index?

I think, they have a point about the spec being both enormous and underspecified, and that there should be other ways to have and query relational data.

But yeah, it looks like some of the points are a bit blown out of proportion. I especially liked those monstrosities of queries that are examples of how the same thing computes different results (but it shouldn’t be allowed, really)

I’m more interested in how do you navigate system menus and such, or does DE manage this? I’ve tried one Linux distro recently without a mouse attached and it was painful because some elements of the system UI are not accessible in any way

I mean the time when games from 90’s were just games, because it was 90’s

What I meant to say is that they can easily use both a phone and a PC, and still think it’s arcane and cryptic. Even if they needed to tinker with it, e.g. a lot of DOS games required me to set IRQ, and I still don’t know precisely what it is

I’m afraid this required much more tinkering back in the day, and will be way less educational now. Maybe building and running a PC from 2005 or earlier will require the same level of getting to know things, but otherwise it will not teach to not treat computer as arcane and enigmatic, imo

Probably not fans of Nintendo or something

That’s how it should be, not how it is

I think what they meant is nobody in management cares if someone wants to hold them accountable

Bit it’s a nice picture, yeah

I’ve been to a very large capital in Europe recently, there’s been a whole three toilets when I needed one, ranging from 15 to 30 minutes away, and the best part is when I got to them, all were inaccessible because they are located inside of the park that closes doors at 18:00 (before that, in fact). The toilets are even marked 24h on the map, very convenient.

So yeah, even not considering drunk people, there are not nearly enough toilets in a lot of places.

Well, they claim that statistically the problem became less severe, so maybe it does work