Sounds infuriating honestly. Being more productive at the cost of mental health isn’t something we should be aiming for as a species.

They did sell it in America at one point, I remember it at the grocery store. Target still has a listing for it. https://www.target.com/p/doritos-spicy-nacho-dips-10oz/-/A-87562774, but it’s ‘out of stock’

that’s totaling from an insurance perspective, not from a repairability perspective. if somehow your bumper cost more than like 70% of the car’s value then you had a decently old car which would have required very specific parts to fix.

pretty sure a lot of that is due to american’s needs to pack a bunch of stuff into their car. we prioritize cabin space. European cars meet the same safety standards and yet aren’t nearly as large.

while yes, it is an inflammatory title, it’s kind of the reverse of what the republicans are doing, which is phrasing that cars are too expensive in order to gut safety regs that cost car manufacturers money rather than make them money.

Seeing as how pulling out of a country is incredibly difficult, I would not in any way say that that is cooperating with Israel. And Israel has the number one teams that crack iPhone security so I’m fairly confident that even if Apple locked down their phones from Israel, they would still manage to use them. Of course it would be better if Apple even tried to do what you suggest, but in actuality it’s a logistical and most likely futile effort.

Go ahead and post the same link for Google job listings. I’ll wait.

Having jobs in the country has nothing to do with being a “committed partner”. You’re making up connections that are most likely not there. Same for anyone claiming the same about Google. Microsoft on the other hand is directly selling and assisting the IDF, they are a committed partner.

That still will not stop a nation state (especially Israel) from getting their hands on Apple devices.

please do explain how Apple is doing anything here. If Israel wants to provide their military with iPhones they’re going to no matter what Apple does.

Yes, and I’m guessing what you wrote about was completely incorrect. Browsers must transfer the data, so any terms of service must cover those cases. Because people don’t understand stuff like this, posts exactly like yours get posted, people believe them, and then misinformation spreads like wildfire.

Then people like me are still dealing with the misinformation months later because others didn’t take five minutes to think through what they were posting before they did so.

I’m honestly incredibly sick of it, especially with Mozilla posts because it’s been misinformation numerous, numerous times. At this point if a post about Mozilla isn’t misinformation then I’m surprised.

What dumb reasoning. Posting anti Mozilla articles only serves to push all of Firefox users to other even less used browsers. See the whole terms of service thing where someone posted an article just like this that was factually incorrect. Many users didn’t bother to research it and stopped using Firefox. Ff didn’t grow, it shrunk and with it every single downstream browser also will suffer because they’re forked from FF

No… because more people would be working on it.

They are not marked as resolved.

That only works if the plugins are somehow accessible through an api controller, which as far as I’m aware, is not how jellyfin plugins work. So no, it wouldn’t increase your attack surface at all.

Aside from most of those being “potential issues”, which weren’t proven, the rest are GETs of things that do not need to be secret, things like album art and list of installed plugins. Besides the one plugin issue, which was an actual security issue, which was fixed over a year and a half ago. https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/pull/11436

Contrast that with Plex which has numerous high severity CVEs that include things like remote code execution, directory traversal, and more.

Anytime I see an anti-mozilla article, it’s abundantly clear that it’s an astroturfing campaign to make Firefox look bad. You NEVER see these articles about chrome, brave, opera, etc which are all much much worse.

Please do explain or link sources to what you think are “security holes”.

Like the other person said, “what ui”? Sounds like you didn’t even try it, like opening up GNOME and saying “this sucks” and then immediately turning the computer off.

It’s eating the cable

It’s also wrong. Cloudflare isn’t built on AWS.